Literature DB >> 10802359

Urinary morbidity with a modified peripheral loading technique of transperineal (125)i prostate implantation.

D Brown1, A Colonias, R Miller, R Benoit, J Cohen, Y Arshoun, M Galloway, S Karlovits, A Wu, M Johnson, A Quinn, S Kalnicki.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Analysis of urinary morbidity within the first 12 months following a modified peripheral loading technique for permanent transperineal transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided (125)I prostate implantation and comparison of urinary morbidity with various clinical and implant parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 1, 1996, and March 11, 1998, 87 patients with favorable, early stage prostate cancer were treated with permanent transperineal TRUS guided (125)I prostate implantation. A peripheral loading technique was utilized for source placement with 75-80% source distribution in the periphery and 20-25% source distribution centrally. A mean total activity of 38 mCi of (125)I was implanted (range, 19-66 mCi). The mean source activity was 0.43 mCi/source (range, 0.26-0.61 mCi/source) and the mean number of sources implanted was 88 (range, 56-134). The minimum prescribed dose to the prostate was 145 Gy. The median D(90), V(100), and V(150) were 152 Gy (range, 104-211 Gy), 92% (range, 71-99%), and 61% (range, 11-89%), respectively. The median follow-up time was 19 months (range, 12-29 months). Urinary morbidity was scored at 3 weeks and then at 3-month intervals for the first 2 years using a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grading system (scale 0-5).
RESULTS: Most patients developed at least minor urinary symptoms with frequency or nocturia being the most common. Overall, 79% (69/87) of patients experienced urinary morbidity with 21% (18/87) reporting no symptoms. The incidence of overall Grade 1 urinary morbidity was 37% (32/87); Grade 2 morbidity was 37% (32/87); and Grade 3 morbidity was 6% (5/87). There was no Grade 4 or 5 morbidity. The incidence of Grade 0 frequency/nocturia was 36% (31/87); Grade 1 was 33% (29/87); Grade 2 was 30% (26/87); and Grade 3 was 1% (1/87). Grade 0 dysuria was seen in 56% (49/87) of patients; 32% (28/87) had Grade 1; 10% (9/87) Grade 2; and 1% (1/87) Grade 3 dysuria. Most urinary symptoms started a few weeks after implantation and began to subside by 6 months. At 12 months, 22% (19/87) of patients had persistent urinary symptoms (78% Grade 0, 15% Grade 1, 3% Grade 2, and 3% Grade 3). The mean urethral point dose was 174 Gy (range, 99-315 Gy). The mean number of sources implanted correlated significantly with the likelihood of developing acute urinary morbidity (p = 0.03). The total activity implanted also correlated with the morbidity outcome dysuria (p = 0.01) with a threshold seen at 37 mCi. Urethral point dose, source activity, intraoperative TRUS prostate volume, D(90), V(100), V(150), patient age, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and T stage did not correlate with morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: Permanent transperineal TRUS guided (125)I prostate implantation using a modified peripheral loading technique is associated with mild urinary morbidity that resolves in 78% of patients by 12 months. Grade 3 urinary morbidity was encountered in only 6% (5/87) of patients. Urinary morbidity may be related to the total number of sources implanted and/or the total activity implanted. Overall urinary morbidity was not correlated with urethral point dose, source activity, intraoperative TRUS prostate volume, D(90), V(100), V(150), patient age, pretreatment PSA, Gleason score, and T stage. The low incidence of urinary morbidity may be a consequence of our modified peripheral loading technique and/or the selection of patients with good-to-excellent preimplant urological parameters. Longer follow-up is necessary to assess biochemical control rates and long-term morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10802359     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00433-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

1.  Permanent prostate brachytherapy: the significance of postimplant dosimetry.

Authors:  W Robert Lee
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

2.  Comparison of urethral diameters for calculating the urethral dose after permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Osamu Tanaka; Shinya Hayashi; Masayuki Matsuo; Masahiro Nakano; Yasuaki Kubota; Sunaho Maeda; Kazuhiro Ohtakara; Takashi Deguchi; Hiroaki Hoshi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-08-27

Review 3.  Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a current review.

Authors:  Jeffrey Woolsey; Nicole Miller; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Acute urinary morbidity after a permanent 125I implantation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Saiji Ohga; Katsumasa Nakamura; Yoshiyuki Shioyama; Katsunori Tatsugami; Tomonari Sasaki; Takeshi Nonoshita; Tadamasa Yoshitake; Kaori Asai; Hideki Hirata; Seiji Naito; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Long term outcome and side effects in patients receiving low-dose I125 brachytherapy: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Pieter Logghe; Rolf Verlinde; Frank Bouttens; Caroline Van den Broecke; Nathalie Deman; Koen Verboven; Dirk Maes; Luc Merckx
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Dosimetric outcomes of preoperative treatment planning with intraoperative optimization using stranded seeds in prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Jason Joon Bock Lee; Eungman Lee; Won Hoon Choi; Jihun Kim; Kyung Hwan Chang; Dong Wook Kim; Han Back Shin; Tae Hyung Kim; Hwa Kyung Byun; Jaeho Cho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Patient reported outcomes for quality of life (QOL) by Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC) on average 15 years post treatment.

Authors:  Zachary A Seymour; Stephanie Daignault-Newton; P W McLaughlin; Howard Sandler; William Jackson; Skyler B Johnson; David Miller; John Wei; Martin Sanda; Daniel A Hamstra
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01

8.  Changes in lower urinary tract symptoms after prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Bruce L Jacobs; Ryan P Smith; Sushil Beriwal; Ronald M Benoit
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-09-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.