Literature DB >> 10800984

Smooth muscle distribution in the extrahepatic bile duct: histologic and immunohistochemical studies of 122 cases.

S M Hong1, G H Kang, H Y Lee, J Y Ro.   

Abstract

The distribution of smooth muscle fibers in the extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) wall is not well characterized. We analyzed 101 consecutive Whipple's operation specimens and 21 autopsy specimens for the pattern of smooth muscle distribution in EBD using the Masson-trichrome stain and the desmin immunohistochemical stain. The patterns were categorized as continuous, interrupted, scattered, and no muscle layer. EBDs were divided into lower, middle, and upper portions, and the distribution pattern of smooth muscle fibers was analyzed separately in each portion. Because most surgically resected specimens contained the middle and lower EBDs with only a portion of the upper EBD, only the length of the middle and lower EBDs (common bile duct, CBD) was measured. The mean length of CBD in surgically resected specimens was 6.4 +/- 1.4 cm (men, 6.6 +/- 1.3 cm; women, 6.1 +/- 1.5 cm). The mean length of CBD in autopsy specimens was 6.8 +/- 1.0 cm. The predominant patterns of the lower third of the EBD were interrupted (49%) and continuous (43%). The predominant patterns of the middle third of the EBD were scattered (63%) and interrupted (23%). Those of the upper third of the EBD were no muscle fiber (58%) and scattered (39%). In conclusion, different patterns of smooth muscle distribution were observed in different portions of the EBD. Because scattered muscle fibers or no muscle fibers were the main features of the upper third of the EBD, understanding of this pattern may be helpful for assessment of the depth of invasion or staging of carcinoma of the upper third of the EBD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10800984     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200005000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  5 in total

1.  Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: tumor depth as a predictor of outcome.

Authors:  Mechteld C de Jong; Seung-Mo Hong; Mathew M Augustine; Michael G Goggins; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Robert A Anders; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-06

Review 2.  Staging of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Eun Chung; Myeong-Jin Kim; Young Nyun Park; Yoon-Hee Lee; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Early bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Myung-Hwan Kim; Se Jin Jang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Prognostic Predictability of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Staging System for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Limited Improvement Compared with the 7th Staging System.

Authors:  Jong Woo Lee; Jae Hoon Lee; Yejong Park; Woohyung Lee; Jaewoo Kwon; Ki Byung Song; Dae Wook Hwang; Song Cheol Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 5.  Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Bohyun Kim; Eun Sun Lee; Hyoung Jung Kim; Ji Hye Min; Jeong Min Lee; Moon Hyung Choi; Nieun Seo; Sang Hyun Choi; Seong Hyun Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Yang Shin Park; Yong Eun Chung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.