Literature DB >> 10800813

25-year experience with 456 combined mitral and aortic valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease.

S John1, E Ravikumar, C N John, V V Bashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Valvular heart disease in developing countries resulting from rheumatic fever is disabling and if untreated leads to congestive heart failure and death. Valve replacement has remained the procedure of choice for advanced valve disease.
METHODS: Between 1973 and 1997, 456 patients underwent combined mitral and aortic valve replacement. In light of our favorable earlier experience the Starr-Edwards ball valve prostheses were implanted in 90% and 72.8% of mitral and aortic positions, respectively. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 24 years with a median of 8.5 years.
RESULTS: The 30-day hospital death rate was 9.2% and late death occurred in 10.1%. A low-intensity anticoagulant regimen was followed to maintain the target prothrombin time at 1.5 times the control value. The actuarial survival at 5, 10, 20, and 24 years was 90.4%, 85.6%, 84.4%, and 82.4% per year, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In view of the acknowledged advantage of superior durability, increased thromboresistance in our patient population, and its cost effectiveness the Starr-Edwards ball valve is the mechanical prosthesis of choice for advanced combined valvular disease. The low-intensity anticoagulant regimen has offered sufficient protection against thromboembolism as well as hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10800813     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01559-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Achieved anticoagulation vs prosthesis selection for mitral mechanical valve replacement: a population-based outcome study.

Authors:  Thierry Le Tourneau; Vanessa Lim; Jocelyn Inamo; Fletcher A Miller; Douglas W Mahoney; Hartzell V Schaff; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario.

Authors:  Devendra Saksena; Yugal K Mishra; S Muralidharan; Vivek Kanhere; Pankaj Srivastava; C P Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-01-28

Review 3.  Simulation of Mechanical Heart Valve Dysfunction and the Non-Newtonian Blood Model Approach.

Authors:  Aolin Chen; Adi Azriff Bin Basri; Norzian Bin Ismail; Masaaki Tamagawa; Di Zhu; Kamarul Arifin Ahmad
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Outcome of left heart mechanical valve replacement in West African children--a 15-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Frank Edwin; Ernest Aniteye; Mark Mawutor Tettey; Martin Tamatey; Kwabena Frimpong-Boateng
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Initial Experience of Minimally Invasive Concomitant Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement/Repair at a Tertiary Care Cardiac Centre of a Developing Country.

Authors:  Kashif Zia; Ali R Mangi; Hafeezullah Bughio; Khuzaima Tariq; Pervaiz A Chaudry; Musa Karim
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-20

6.  Analysis of anticoagulation therapy related complications in patients with prosthetic valves: Our experience.

Authors:  Vikrampal Singh; Arun Garg; Gurmeet Singh; Samir Kapoor; Sarju Ralhan; Rajesh Arya; Bishav Mohan; Gurpreet S Wander; Rajiv K Gupta
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.