Literature DB >> 10799197

Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of urgency-frequency symptoms: a multicenter study on efficacy and safety.

M M Hassouna1, S W Siegel, A A Nÿeholt, M M Elhilali, P E van Kerrebroeck, A K Das, J B Gajewski, R A Janknegt, D A Rivas, H Dijkema, D F Milam, K A Oleson, R A Schmidt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Neuromodulation of sacral nerves has shown promising results in correcting voiding dysfunction. We report the results of a multicenter trial designed to assess the efficacy of sacral nerve neuromodulation in patients presenting with refractory urinary urgency-frequency.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 51 patients from 12 centers underwent baseline assessment, including a detailed voiding diary, urodynamic evaluation and percutaneous test stimulation of the sacral nerves at S3 and/or S4. All patients enrolled in the study had undergone prior conventional treatment, such as pharmacotherapy, hydrodistention and surgical intervention, which failed. All patients demonstrated a satisfactory response to trial stimulation and were randomly divided into a stimulation group (25 patients) and a control group (26). A sacral nerve stimulation device was implanted after 6 months in the control group. Patients were followed at 1, 3 and 6 months, and at 6-month intervals for up to 2 years after implantation of a neuroprosthetic InterStim* system. dagger The study variables included the number of voids daily, volume voided per void and degree of urgency before void.
RESULTS: Compared to the control group, 6-month voiding diary results demonstrated statistically significant improvements (p <0.0001) in the stimulation group with respect to the number voids daily (16.9 +/- 9.7 to 9.3 +/- 5.1), volume per void (118 +/- 74 to 226 +/- 124 ml.) and degree of urgency (rank 2.2 +/- 0.6 to 1.6 +/- 0.9). Patients in the control group showed no significant changes in voiding parameters at 6 months. Significant improvements in favor of the stimulation group were noted in various parameters with respect to water cystometry and quality of life (SF-36). At 6 months after implant, neurostimulators were turned off in the stimulation group and urinary symptoms returned to baseline values. After reactivation of stimulation sustained efficacy was documented at 12 and 24 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation of the sacral nerves is an effective, safe therapy that successfully treats significant symptoms of refractory urgency-frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10799197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  61 in total

1.  Lead migration after sacral neuromodulation: surgical revision in fascial versus tined anchoring systems.

Authors:  Nazema Y Siddiqui; Cindy L Amundsen; Elizabeth G Corey; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Managing nocturia.

Authors:  Serge P Marinkovic; Lisa M Gillen; Stuart L Stanton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-01

Review 3.  [Botulinum toxin versus sacral neuromodulation for idiopathic detrusor overactivity].

Authors:  W Leicht; C Hampel; J Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  A systematic review of clinical studies of electrical stimulation for treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Authors:  Ash K Monga; Michael R Tracey; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Spontaneous extrusion of sacral nerve implant secondary to massive weight loss.

Authors:  Christopher J Nold; Mary T McLennan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-04-11

Review 6.  Sacral nerve stimulation: neuromodulation for voiding dysfunction and pain.

Authors:  Robert D Mayer; Fred M Howard
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 7.  Isolated urinary retention in young women, or Fowler's syndrome.

Authors:  M J Swinn; C J Fowler
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.435

8.  Concerns regarding sacral neuromodulation as a treatment option for medical-refractory overactive bladder.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Luc Valiquette
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  The surgical management of the refractory overactive bladder.

Authors:  Nikhil Vasdev; Benjamin D Biles; Raveen Sandher; Tahseen S Hasan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-04

10.  Refractory overactive bladder: Beyond oral anticholinergic therapy.

Authors:  Ronald W Glinski; Steven Siegel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.