Literature DB >> 10799177

Effect of radical prostatectomy on sensory threshold and pressure transmission.

H John1, M P Sullivan, U Bangerter, D Hauri, S V Yalla.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The mechanisms involved in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence remain unclear despite previous anatomical and functional studies. In addition, the factors responsible for the restoration of continence are not well studied. To improve our understanding of the alterations in continence mechanisms, we prospectively investigated the temporal changes in urodynamic parameters after radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystometry, urethral pressure profilometry and posterior urethral sensory threshold measurements were performed in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Preoperative pressure transmission was determined by the maximal urethral pressure divided by the maximal abdominal pressure during cough maneuvers at a bladder volume of 200 ml. Postoperative sensory threshold, pressure transmission (% of pressure transmission), maximal urethral closure pressure and functional sphincter length were measured 6 weeks and 6 months after prostatectomy. These parameters were compared between continent and incontinent patients.
RESULTS: Preoperative and postoperative urodynamic studies were completed in 34 patients. The continence rate after 6 weeks was 18% (6 patients) and improved to 82% (28) after 6 months. Preoperatively sensory threshold was 16 +/- 11 mA. After 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively, sensory threshold was significantly higher in incontinent (84 +/- 11 mA., 70 +/- 8 mA.) compared to continent (65 +/- 8 mA., 41 +/- 12 mA.) patients. Preoperative proximal urethral sensory threshold was not correlated with degree of postoperative incontinence determined by pad tests. Pressure transmission was not different in continent and incontinent patients postoperatively. After 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively, pressure transmission was 77% and 91% in continent, and 37% and 58% in incontinent patients (p = 0.04, p = 0.03). Maximal urethral closure pressure was significantly higher in continent patients (35 +/- 6 cm. H2O) compared to incontinent patients (11 +/- 9 cm. H2O). Sphincter length decreased from 50 mm. preoperatively to 24 mm. after 6 weeks and 25 mm. after 6 months. There was no difference in sphincter length between continent and incontinent patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior urethral sensitivity and pressure transmission are impaired immediately after prostatectomy. An improvement in these parameters after 6 months is associated with the restoration of continence. These observations suggest that urinary continence after radical prostatectomy depends on the integrity of posterior urethral sensation and the efficiency of pressure transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10799177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: update 2008].

Authors:  H John
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Incontinence after radical prostatectomy: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  S A MacDiarmid
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  The Role of Urodynamics in Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence.

Authors:  Maria Arcila-Ruiz; Benjamin M Brucker
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Urodynamic assessment of bladder and urethral function among men with lower urinary tract symptoms after radical prostatectomy: A comparison between men with and without urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Hansol Lee; Ki Bom Kim; Sangchul Lee; Sang Wook Lee; Myong Kim; Sung Yong Cho; Seung-June Oh; Seong Jin Jeong
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-11-26

Review 5.  Lower urinary tract electrical sensory assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stéphanie van der Lely; Melanie R Schmidhalter; Stephanie C Knüpfer; Andrea M Sartori; Marc P Schneider; Stephanie A Stalder; Thomas M Kessler; Martina D Liechti; Ulrich Mehnert
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 5.969

6.  Significance of preoperatively observed detrusor overactivity as a predictor of continence status early after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Akihiro Yanagiuchi; Hideaki Miyake; Kazushi Tanaka; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Effect of Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy on Urinary Continence in Patients With Preoperative Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Yong Hyun Park; Oh Seong Kwon; Sung-Hoo Hong; Sae Woong Kim; Tae-Kon Hwang; Ji Youl Lee
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery.

Authors:  Christophe Almeras; Christophe Tollon; Ambroise Salin; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Guillaume Loison; Jean Romain Gautier; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Association between cystographic anastomotic urinary leakage following retropubic radical prostatectomy and early urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Se Yun Kwon
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2020-11-19

Review 10.  De Novo Detrusor Underactivity and Other Urodynamic Findings after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maciej Oszczudłowski; Konrad Bilski; Mieszko Kozikowski; Jakub Dobruch
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.