Literature DB >> 10799154

Long-term followup of elderly donors in a live related renal transplant program.

A Kumar1, B S Verma, A Srivastava, M Bhandari, A Gupta, R K Sharma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is a concern that elderly donors may have increased risks in the perioperative period due to age related changes in various organ systems. Nephrosclerosis, atherosclerosis and low glomerular filtration rate may portend a poor graft outcome. We performed a study to determine function and outcome of kidneys from elderly donors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of our live related transplant program from November 1989 to December 1998 revealed that 112 donors were older than 55 years (range 55 to 81). Of the recipients of these kidneys from elderly donors 98 had a followup of more than 2 years (group 1), and they were compared to a cohort of 87 patients whose kidney donors were younger than 45 years (group 2). Allograft function was evaluated by serum creatinine and differential glomerular filtration rate was determined by (99m)technetium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid renal scan. All donors were followed regularly.
RESULTS: Mean donor age plus or minus standard deviation was 57.4 +/- 4.3 and 31.4 +/- 7.6 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Mean followup plus or minus standard deviation was 42.44 +/- 20.46 months in group 1 and 40.04 +/- 27.28 months in group 2. The 1-year graft survival rate was 91.84% and 88. 51%, and the 5-year graft survival rate was 72.72% and 75.13% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Serum creatinine was 1.5 +/- 0.65 and 1.7 +/- 1.52 mg./dl. in group 1 and 1.4 +/- 0.55 and 1.5 +/- 1.41 mg. /dl. in group 2 at 1 year and last followup, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate was 37.2 +/- 11.2 and 37.3 +/- 10.7 ml. per minute in group 1 and it was 45.3 +/- 8.6 and 47.7 +/- 11.3 ml. per minute in group 2 at 1 year and last followup, respectively. Acute rejection rate was significantly higher in group 1 (42%) compared to group 2 (19%). Both groups were comparable in terms of infectious episodes, antihypertensive requirement and incidence of acute tubular necrosis. There was no added morbidity for elderly compared to younger donors.
CONCLUSIONS: In view of acute donor shortage and if properly screened, elderly kidneys can be used without increasing the risk to donor or compromising graft outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10799154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  The aging kidney: a review--part II.

Authors:  Fred G Silva
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Grandparent donors in paediatric renal transplantation.

Authors:  Catherine M Simpson; Steven J McTaggart; Jonathan A C Sterne; Rowan G Walker; Harley R Powell; Colin L Jones
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 3.714

3.  Consideration of donor age and human leukocyte antigen matching in the setting of multiple potential living kidney donors.

Authors:  Michael D Rizzari; Thomas M Suszynski; Kristen J Gillingham; Arthur J Matas
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Evaluation of the medically complex living kidney donor.

Authors:  Yasar Caliskan; Alaattin Yildiz
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-05-13

5.  Outcomes following renal transplantation in older people: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Niall J Dempster; Carlo D L Ceresa; Emma Aitken; David Kingsmore
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Marginal kidney donor.

Authors:  Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Siva Prasad Gourabathini
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.