Literature DB >> 10799098

Quality and outcome determination in health care and orthopaedics: evolution and current structure.

W J Daum1, M R Brinker, D B Nash.   

Abstract

Quality health care has many definitions. Among those definitions is "care that consistently contributes to the improvement or maintenance of the quality and/or duration of life." The current evolution in health care has been fueled by three necessities frequently demanded by payers and employers: improvement in access, lowering of cost, and definition and quantification of the quality of care. This evolution has been facilitated by the so-called industrialization of medicine. This concept includes the adoption of industrial economic principles and techniques that facilitate the measurement of processes and outcomes. Quality health care is currently recognized as health care that is characterized by three elements: the use of practice guidelines or standards, the implementation of continuous quality improvement techniques, and the use of outcome determination and management. Practice guidelines demand the adoption of evidence-based principles in evaluation and care, as well as minimization of variations in evaluation and care. Continuous quality improvement seeks to determine why variations in processes of care occur and then to minimize those variations. Outcomes may be measured in terms of both very objective and very subjective variables and also on the basis of cost-efficiency. Most tools currently used to quantify outcomes, especially in orthopaedics, involve measurements of general health and of specific body part or organ system function. This evolution in health care is producing significant alterations in methods of traditional health-care delivery. The accumulating evidence indicates that these changes, although frequently unpopular, are improving the quality of health care.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10799098     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200003000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  4 in total

1.  Defining "quality of care" persuasively.

Authors:  Maya J Goldenberg
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Stakeholders in outcome measures: review from a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Mark R Brinker; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Effect of Patient Demographics on Minimally Important Difference of Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale Among End-Stage Ankle Arthritis Patients.

Authors:  Jason M Sutherland; Carmela Melina Albanese; Kevin Wing; Yixiang Jenny Zhang; Alastair Younger; Andrea Veljkovic; Murray Penner
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Reliability and validity of the adapted Greek version of scoliosis research society - 22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.

Authors:  Petros D Antonarakos; Labrini Katranitsa; Lefteris Angelis; Aristofanis Paganas; Errikos M Koen; Evangelos A Christodoulou; Anastasios G Christodoulou
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-07-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.