B R Hammond1, M Caruso-Avery. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens 30677, USA. bhammond@egon.psy.uga.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Increasing evidence implicates macular pigment in protecting the retina and retinal pigment epithelium from light-initiated oxidative damage. Little information, however, is available regarding "average" levels of macular pigment in the general population. This study was designed to assess macular pigment in a high-light environment and to determine what personal characteristics influence macular pigment density in that sample. METHODS: Macular pigment optical density was measured psychophysically using a 1 degree, 460-nm test stimulus. Personal data were collected using a questionnaire. RESULTS: 217 subjects (79 men, 138 women) were recruited from the Phoenix metropolitan area (age range = 17-92 years). The average macular pigment density was 0.22 +/- 0.13. There was a slight tendency for macular pigment density in this sample to decline with age (r = -0.14, P < 0.02). Average macular pigment density was significantly lower in women versus men (P < 0.05), lower in individuals with light-colored irises versus dark-colored irises (P < 0.009), and lower in heavy smokers compared to light (P < 0.0045) and never (P < 0.034) smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Macular pigment density was lower than average levels obtained from the Northeast but similar to average values obtained in a recent study of adults recruited from Indianapolis. Consistent with past studies, MP density was 13% lower in women and 18% lower in individuals with light- versus dark-colored irises. The relation of smoking to macular pigment density was only significant for those current smokers who smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day (about a 25% reduction). The large number of individuals in this sample with low macular pigment density motivates the need for population-based assessment of the possibly poor nutritional state of the average American's retina.
PURPOSE: Increasing evidence implicates macular pigment in protecting the retina and retinal pigment epithelium from light-initiated oxidative damage. Little information, however, is available regarding "average" levels of macular pigment in the general population. This study was designed to assess macular pigment in a high-light environment and to determine what personal characteristics influence macular pigment density in that sample. METHODS: Macular pigment optical density was measured psychophysically using a 1 degree, 460-nm test stimulus. Personal data were collected using a questionnaire. RESULTS: 217 subjects (79 men, 138 women) were recruited from the Phoenix metropolitan area (age range = 17-92 years). The average macular pigment density was 0.22 +/- 0.13. There was a slight tendency for macular pigment density in this sample to decline with age (r = -0.14, P < 0.02). Average macular pigment density was significantly lower in women versus men (P < 0.05), lower in individuals with light-colored irises versus dark-colored irises (P < 0.009), and lower in heavy smokers compared to light (P < 0.0045) and never (P < 0.034) smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Macular pigment density was lower than average levels obtained from the Northeast but similar to average values obtained in a recent study of adults recruited from Indianapolis. Consistent with past studies, MP density was 13% lower in women and 18% lower in individuals with light- versus dark-colored irises. The relation of smoking to macular pigment density was only significant for those current smokers who smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day (about a 25% reduction). The large number of individuals in this sample with low macular pigment density motivates the need for population-based assessment of the possibly poor nutritional state of the average American's retina.
Authors: Henrike Wüstemeyer; Andreas Moessner; Cornelia Jahn; Sebastian Wolf Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2003-07-17 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: M Trieschmann; G Spital; A Lommatzsch; E van Kuijk; F Fitzke; A C Bird; D Pauleikhoff Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2003-11-14 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Cornelia Jahn; Henrike Wüstemeyer; Christian Brinkmann; Sandra Trautmann; Andreas Mössner; Sebastian Wolf Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2004-10-02 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Alessandro Iannaccone; Marco Mura; Kevin T Gallaher; Elizabeth J Johnson; William Andrew Todd; Emily Kenyon; Tarsha L Harris; Tamara Harris; Suzanne Satterfield; Karen C Johnson; Stephen B Kritchevsky Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Robin G Abell; Alex W Hewitt; Marko Andric; Penelope L Allen; Nitin Verma Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2014-01-05 Impact factor: 3.117