L Jia1, W O Cepurna, E C Johnson, J C Morrison. 1. Kenneth C. Swan Ocular Neurobiology Laboratory, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the diural intraocular pressure (IOP) response of Brown Norway rat eyes after sclerosis of the aqueous humor outflow pathways and its relationship to optic nerve damage. METHODS: Hypertonic saline was injected into a single episcleral vein in 17 animals and awake IOP measured in both the light and dark phases of the circadian cycle for 34 days. Mean IOP for light and dark phases during the experimental period were compared with the respective pressures of the uninjected fellow eyes. Optic nerve cross sections from each nerve were graded for injury by five independent masked observers. RESULTS: For fellow eyes, mean light- and dark-phase IOP was 21 +/- 1 and 31 +/- 1 mm Hg, respectively. For four experimental eyes, mean IOPs for both phases were not altered. Six eyes demonstrated significant mean IOP elevations only during the dark phase. Of these, five showed persistent, large circadian oscillations, and four had partial optic nerve lesions. The remaining seven eyes experienced significant IOP elevations during both phases, and all had extensive optic nerve damage. CONCLUSIONS: Episcleral vein injection of hypertonic saline is more likely to increase IOP during the dark phase than the light. This is consistent with aqueous outflow obstruction superimposed on a circadian rhythm of aqueous humor production. Because these periodic IOP elevations produced optic nerve lesions, both light- and dark-phase IOP determinations are necessary for accurate correlation of IOP history to optic nerve damage in animals housed in a light- dark environment.
PURPOSE: To determine the diural intraocular pressure (IOP) response of Brown Norway rat eyes after sclerosis of the aqueous humor outflow pathways and its relationship to optic nerve damage. METHODS:Hypertonicsaline was injected into a single episcleral vein in 17 animals and awake IOP measured in both the light and dark phases of the circadian cycle for 34 days. Mean IOP for light and dark phases during the experimental period were compared with the respective pressures of the uninjected fellow eyes. Optic nerve cross sections from each nerve were graded for injury by five independent masked observers. RESULTS: For fellow eyes, mean light- and dark-phase IOP was 21 +/- 1 and 31 +/- 1 mm Hg, respectively. For four experimental eyes, mean IOPs for both phases were not altered. Six eyes demonstrated significant mean IOP elevations only during the dark phase. Of these, five showed persistent, large circadian oscillations, and four had partial optic nerve lesions. The remaining seven eyes experienced significant IOP elevations during both phases, and all had extensive optic nerve damage. CONCLUSIONS: Episcleral vein injection of hypertonicsaline is more likely to increase IOP during the dark phase than the light. This is consistent with aqueous outflow obstruction superimposed on a circadian rhythm of aqueous humor production. Because these periodic IOP elevations produced optic nerve lesions, both light- and dark-phase IOP determinations are necessary for accurate correlation of IOP history to optic nerve damage in animals housed in a light- dark environment.
Authors: Marta Pazos; Hongli Yang; Stuart K Gardiner; William O Cepurna; Elaine C Johnson; John C Morrison; Claude F Burgoyne Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Bailey G Hannon; Stephen A Schwaner; Elizabeth M Boazak; Brandon G Gerberich; Erin J Winger; Mark R Prausnitz; C Ross Ethier Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Ying Guo; William O Cepurna; Jennifer A Dyck; Tom A Doser; Elaine C Johnson; John C Morrison Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Kevin C Chan; Yu Yu; Shuk Han Ng; Heather K Mak; Yolanda W Y Yip; Yolandi van der Merwe; Tianmin Ren; Jasmine S Y Yung; Sayantan Biswas; Xu Cao; Ying Chau; Christopher K S Leung Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Shandiz Tehrani; Elaine C Johnson; William O Cepurna; John C Morrison Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Wei Huang; John B Fileta; Adam Dobberfuhl; Theodoros Filippopolous; Yan Guo; Gina Kwon; Cynthia L Grosskreutz Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-08-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lidawani Lambuk; Azliana Jusnida Ahmad Jafri; Natasha Najwa Nor Arfuzir; Igor Iezhitsa; Renu Agarwal; Khairul Nizam Bin Rozali; Puneet Agarwal; Nor Salmah Bakar; Methil Kannan Kutty; Ahmad Pauzi Md Yusof; Anna Krasilnikova; Alexander Spasov; Alexander Ozerov; Nafeeza Mohd Ismail Journal: Neurotox Res Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 3.911