Literature DB >> 10798136

Prenatal diagnosis and assessment of fetal malformations by ultrasonography in India.

D Deka1, N Malhotra, D Takkar, S Mittal, A Kriplani, K K Roy.   

Abstract

A multicentre study to assess the status of prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformation in India was conducted. Questionnaires were sent to the teaching hospitals and to centres in the private sector involved with ultrasonography in all the four zones. Data were obtained from 13 centres. Basic level I scans were performed on all pregnant women in 64% centres, whereas level II or targeted scans were performed as routine in 42% centres. Obstetricians performed level II scans in only 35% of cases while rest were performed by radiologists. Malformations of the central nervous system were commonest, accounting for 35-69% of all malformations, followed by genitourinary and gastrointestinal malformations. Malformations of the cardiovascular system were detected in 9.3% as abnormal four chamber view and outlet tract abnormalities, subsequently confirmed on fetal echocardiography. Invasive prenatal diagnosis by fetal blood sampling, chorion villus sampling and amniocentesis for chromosomal analysis of malformed fetuses was performed at 40% centres. At the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, approximately 11,042 ultrasound scans were performed by obstetricians as routine in all pregnant women. A total of 543 malformations were detected accounting for a 4.9% incidence of structural anomalies. A total of 98 cardiovascular malformations were detected in high and low risk pregnant women on fetal echocardiography. No database or registry exists in India to give an actual insight into the problem of congenital malformation and their prenatal diagnosis. It is important to train obstetricians in level I and II ultrasonography, to recognise centres and institutions at national and regional level, and to integrate a network of diagnostic testing. Close liaison between geneticists, radiologists, pediatric surgeons, pediatricians and obstetricians is a must for prenatal diagnosis and management of fetal malformations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10798136     DOI: 10.1007/bf02726266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   1.967


  10 in total

1.  Does autopsy of antenatally diagnosed malformed foetuses aid genetic counselling?

Authors:  J Pahi; S R Phadke; A Halder; A Gupta; R Pandey; S S Agarwal
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.537

2.  Psychological reactions to ultrasound. Examination during pregnancy.

Authors:  L Michelacci; G A Fava; S Grandi; L Bovicelli; C Orlandi; G Trombini
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 17.659

3.  The use of a proforma in obstetric ultrasound.

Authors:  G K Leadbeatter
Journal:  Radiography       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec

4.  Prenatal diagnosis of orofaciodigital syndrome: Mohr type.

Authors:  S Suresh; K Rajesh; I Suresh; V Raja; D Gopish; S Gnanasoundari
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Prenatal diagnosis of tetralogy of Fallot with absent pulmonary valve.

Authors:  H S Rane; K R Shah; H Purandare
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  Routine obstetric ultrasound.

Authors:  D W Skupski; F A Chervenak; L B McCullough
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 7.  Lethal fetal anomalies: sonographic demonstration.

Authors:  R C Sanders; K Blakemore
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Early ultrasound diagnosis of fetal congenital heart defects in high-risk and low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  M Bronshtein; E Z Zimmer; L M Gerlis; A Lorber; A Drugan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.

Authors:  B G Ewigman; J P Crane; F D Frigoletto; M L LeFevre; R P Bain; D McNellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Short rib polydactyly syndrome--a rare skeletal dysplasia.

Authors:  R Lavanya; K Pratap
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.561

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.