Literature DB >> 10797889

The assessment of Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency in children.

T Düger1, G Bumin, M Uyanik, E Aki, H Kayihan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to research the relationship between motor abilities and demographic characteristics such as age and sex, in healthy children aged 4-11 years.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty children in kindergarten (n = 30) and primary school (n = 90) were included in the study and evaluated by the Occupational Therapy Unit. All children were divided into four groups according to age, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9 and 10-11 years. The primary school children were classified according to academic learning, being successful or unsuccessful. In this study, Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency was used to assess the gross motor skills and fine motor skills. These tests are running speed and agility (subtest 1/item 1), balance/walking forward heel-to-toe on walking line (subtest 2/item 6), bilateral coordination/tapping-foot and finger on same side synchronized (subtest 3/item 2), strength/standing broad jump (subtest 4/item 1), response speed (subtest 6/item 1), visual motor control/cutting out a circle with preferred hand (subtest 7/item 1), upper-limb speed and dexterity/pacing pennies in two boxes with both hands (subtest 8/item 2).
RESULTS: When the children were classified according to sex, there were significant differences in subtests 6 and 7. According to academic learning, there were significant differences in subtests 2 and 8. When the results were evaluated due to age, important differences were found in subtests 1, 2, 4 and 8.
CONCLUSION: It was seen that gross and fine motor skills in early childhood showed variety between age, sex and academic learning. The scores of motor abilities were better in successful children than unsuccessful children. The outcome of this study revealed that the Bruininks-Oseretsky test can be useful to investigate unexplored aspects of motor development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10797889     DOI: 10.1080/136384999289531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Rehabil        ISSN: 1363-8491


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and proposal of a field-based physical fitness-test battery in preschool children: the PREFIT battery.

Authors:  Francisco B Ortega; Cristina Cadenas-Sánchez; Guillermo Sánchez-Delgado; José Mora-González; Borja Martínez-Téllez; Enrique G Artero; Jose Castro-Piñero; Idoia Labayen; Palma Chillón; Marie Löf; Jonatan R Ruiz
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Denver Developmental Screening Test II.

Authors:  Beatriz De-Andrés-Beltrán; Ángel L Rodríguez-Fernández; Javier Güeita-Rodríguez; Johan Lambeck
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 3.  Movement skill assessment of typically developing preschool children: a review of seven movement skill assessment tools.

Authors:  Wouter Cools; Kristine De Martelaer; Christiane Samaey; Caroline Andries
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  A Dynamic Assessment of Children's Physical Competence: The Dragon Challenge.

Authors:  Richard Tyler; Lawrence Foweather; Kelly A Mackintosh; Gareth Stratton
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Postural stability and visual impairment: Assessing balance in children with strabismus and amblyopia.

Authors:  Anat Bachar Zipori; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong; Sharon L Cushing; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Performances of the Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA), and validity of timing components in comparison with three commonly used agility tests in Chinese boys: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Chunhua Zhang; Rong Guo; Dandan Zhang; Shijiao Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA): Validity, objectivity, and reliability evidence for children 8-12 years of age.

Authors:  Patricia E Longmuir; Charles Boyer; Meghann Lloyd; Michael M Borghese; Emily Knight; Travis J Saunders; Elena Boiarskaia; Weimo Zhu; Mark S Tremblay
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 7.179

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.