Literature DB >> 10796956

The value of the oblique groin incision for femoral artery access during endovascular procedures.

J M Caiati1, D Kaplan, D Gitlitz, L H Hollier, M L Marin.   

Abstract

Groin incisions for access to femoral vessels are typically made in a vertical fashion extending across the groin crease. Significant morbidity can be associated with these incisions, including lymphoceles, lymph fistulae and infections, as documented in the infrainguinal revascularization literature. We have adopted an oblique groin incision for femoral artery access during endovascular graft reconstruction of the aorta because of the potential for reduced wound morbidity. In this study we report our experience with this technique and compare it with the existing literature to determine its usefulness. From June 1998 to May 1999, 98 consecutive patients received endovascular exclusion of aortic aneurysms at The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York. Patients were treated with aortoaortic (24), aortouniiliac with femorofemoral crossover bypass (41), or bifurcated endografts (33) and were prospectively studied for wound complications. Aortoaortic procedures required one inguinal incision whereas aortouniiliac with femorofemoral crossover bypass and bifurcated procedures employed bilateral inguinal wounds. Wound complications were defined as cellulitis, subcutaneous purulence, femorofemoral graft infection, lymphocele, or lymphocutaneous fistulae. The oblique groin incision allows adequate exposure to the femoral arteries and is associated with low wound morbidity. We suggest that this approach may be the preferred technique for access to femoral arteries during endovascular procedures, and should be considered for infrainguinal arterial reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10796956     DOI: 10.1007/s100169910042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Management of lymphatic fistulas in the groin from a surgeon's perspective].

Authors:  B Juntermanns; A E Cyrek; J Bernheim; J N Hoffmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair is not contraindicated in obese patients.

Authors:  Jason Zakko; Salvatore Scali; Adam W Beck; Charles T Klodell; Thomas M Beaver; Tomas D Martin; Thomas S Huber; Robert J Feezor
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Transverse versus vertical groin incision for femoral artery approach.

Authors:  Marcus Canteras; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Frederico do Carmo Novaes; Daniel G Cacione
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.