Literature DB >> 10796937

Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram--prospective comparison with scintigraphy.

L R Goodman1, R J Lipchik, R S Kuzo, Y Liu, T L McAuliffe, D J O'Brien.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether a helical computed tomographic (CT) scan that is negative for pulmonary embolism (PE) is a sufficiently reliable criterion to safely withhold anticoagulation therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with negative helical CT scans were prospectively compared with patients with negative or low-probability scintigrams. In a 460-bed university hospital and clinic, 1,015 adult patients underwent either scintigraphy or helical CT for possible PE for 25 months. Five hundred forty-eight patients who had negative images and were not receiving anticoagulation therapy were prospectively followed up for 3 months for clinical, new imaging, death certificate, or autopsy evidence of subsequent PE. Ninety-seven patients were lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: Subsequent PE was found in two (1.0%) of 198 patients with negative CT scans, none of 188 patients with negative ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scans, and five (3.1%) of 162 patients with low-probability V-P scans (not statistically significant). Patients in the helical CT group were hospitalized more often, had more severe disease, had more substantial PE risk factors, and had a higher death rate. No deaths were attributed to PE in either group.
CONCLUSION: The frequency of clinical diagnoses of PE after a negative CT scan was low and similar to that after a negative or low-probability V-P scan. Helical CT is a reliable imaging tool for excluding clinically important PE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10796937     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma23535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  24 in total

Review 1.  Acute pulmonary embolism 1: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis.

Authors:  M Riedel
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary embolus.

Authors:  A K Dixon; R A Coulden; A M Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-25

3.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Pulmonary embolism: is multislice CT the method of choice? Against.

Authors:  Carl Schuemichen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Pulmonary embolism: is multislice CT the method of choice? For.

Authors:  Ieneke J C Hartmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: time to rewrite the textbooks.

Authors:  U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Dyspnea with hemoglobin SC disease.

Authors:  Linda S Bang; Robert D Black; Shelley A Hall; William C Roberts
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2002-01

8.  Reproducibility of multi-detector spiral computed tomography in detection of sub-segmental acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  S Brunot; O Corneloup; V Latrabe; M Montaudon; F Laurent
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Multidetector computed tomographic angiography of the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  Joshua Burrill; Zaid Dabbagh; Frank Gollub; Mohamed Hamady
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Multislice CT angiography.

Authors:  U Joseph Schoepf; Christoph R Becker; Lars K Hofmann; Marco Das; Thomas Flohr; Bernd M Ohnesorge; Bernhard Baumert; Joshua Rolnick; Jean M Allen; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.