Literature DB >> 10796880

Predictive value of the variceal pressure response to continued pharmacological therapy in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

A Escorsell1, J M Bordas, B Castañeda, J Llach, J C García-Pagán, J Rodés, J Bosch.   

Abstract

Noninvasive measurements of variceal pressure adequately reflect the hemodynamic effects of propranolol on portal hypertension. However, the prognostic value of variceal pressure responses during continued propranolol therapy has not been evaluated, and it is unclear whether this may substitute invasive measurements of portal pressure response. Fifty-five portal hypertensive patients with cirrhosis were studied before and at 4 months of continued propranolol therapy. Variceal pressure was measured using an endoscopic pressure gauge. Portal pressure was evaluated as the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). Over a 28 +/- 11 month follow-up, 16 patients experienced variceal bleeding. Baseline characteristics were similar in bleeders and nonbleeders. At 4 months, reduction in variceal pressure was less marked in bleeders than in nonbleeders (5% +/- 20% vs. -15% +/- 24%; P =.03). A fall in variceal pressure 20% or greater of baseline was an independent predictor of absence of variceal bleeding; which occurred in 5% of patients with a 20% or greater fall in variceal pressure versus 42% of patients with less than a 20% reduction (P =.004). The HVPG response had similar independent prognostic value (decrease > or =20%: 6% bleeding; decrease <20%: 45% bleeding; P =.004) but identified different patients. Achieving a 20% decrease in either variceal pressure or HVPG was highly sensitive (85%) and specific (93%) identifying patients not bleeding on follow-up. Endoscopic measurements of variceal pressure response to continued pharmacotherapy provide useful prognostic information on the risk of variceal bleeding. As with HVPG response, a fall in variceal pressure of 20% or greater is associated with a very low risk of variceal bleeding. The combination of both parameters allows almost optimal prognostication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10796880     DOI: 10.1053/he.2000.6779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  15 in total

Review 1.  Hepatic venous pressure gradient: worth another look?

Authors:  Sameer Parikh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Use of portal pressure studies in the management of variceal haemorrhage.

Authors:  Jennifer Addley; Tony Ck Tham; William Jonathan Cash
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-16

3.  Acute propranolol administration effectively decreases portal pressure in patients with TIPS dysfunction. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt.

Authors:  L Bellis; E Moitinho; J G Abraldes; M Graupera; J C García-Pagán; J Rodés; J Bosch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Management of special conditions in patients on vitamin K antagonists.

Authors:  Francesco Marongiu; Guido Finazzi; Vittorio Pengo; Daniela Poli; Sophie Testa; Armando Tripodi
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  The extent of the collateral circulation influences the postprandial increase in portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  Agustín Albillos; Rafael Bañares; Mónica González; Maria-Vega Catalina; Oscar Pastor; Rosario Gonzalez; Cristina Ripoll; Jaime Bosch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Current management of portal hypertension.

Authors:  Andrew S Wright; Layton F Rikkers
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Monitoring target reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient during pharmacological therapy of portal hypertension: a close look at the evidence.

Authors:  U Thalheimer; M Mela; D Patch; A K Burroughs
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Venous thromboembolism in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zhineng J Yang; Karen A Costa; Enrico M Novelli; Roy E Smith
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.389

9.  Effect of intravariceal sclerotherapy combined with esophageal mucosal sclerotherapy using small-volume sclerosant for cirrhotic patients with high variceal pressure.

Authors:  De-Run Kong; Jin-Guang Wang; Chen Chen; Fang-Fang Yu; Qiong Wu; Jian-Ming Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Effects of propranolol or propranolol plus isosorbide-5-mononitrate on variceal pressure in schistosomiasis.

Authors:  De-Run Kong; Chao Ma; Min Wang; Jing-Guang Wang; Chen Chen; Lei Zhang; Jia-Hu Hao; Pan Li; Jian-Ming Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.