Literature DB >> 10796736

Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.

P Martin-Hirsch1, G Jarvis, H Kitchener, R Lilford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The false-negative rate of cervical smears varies between 1.5% and 55%. This variation may be partly due to differences in sampling device and technique. The objective of this review was to assess different cervical sampling devices for collecting endocervical cells, which are thought to be a surrogate for detection of abnormal cells and adequate smear rates. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group trials register and MEDLINE up to July 1997. We also handsearched 16 journals. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials and non-randomised comparative studies comparing cervical smear collection devices in women attending for primary screening, colposcopy following an abnormal smear or colposcopy after treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently abstracted data. Study quality was assessed. MAIN
RESULTS: Thirty-four trials and six observational comparative studies were included. The Ayre spatula was shown to be less effective compared with extended tip spatulas for collecting endocervical cells in eight trials (odds ratio 2.25, 95% confidence interval 2.06 to 2.44). Use of a spatula with the cytobrush was more effective than spatula alone at collecting endocervical cells (odds ratio 3.33, 95% 3.05 to 3.63) and the same effect was present for adequate smear rates (odds ratio 1.51 95% 1.19-1.92). Extended tip spatulas were also superior for the detection of dyskaryosis in seven trials (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.33). Based on data from two trials and three observational studies, smears that contained endocervical cells were more likely to detect dyskaryosis, particularly in severe disease. The proportion of smears with endocervical cells present increased with increasing severity of the disease. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Extended tip spatulas of various designs appear to be better for collecting endocervical cells than the commonly used Ayre spatula. The most effective combination appears to be the cytobrush with an extended tip spatula. The rate of detection of endocervical cells appears to be a valid and convenient surrogate for the ability to detect dyskaryosis and for adequate smear rates. The ability of the extended tip spatula with the cytobrush compared with the extended tip spatula alone to detect disease, needs to be evaluated in a trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10796736     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  6 in total

1.  [Quality of conventional PAP smears. Quality assessment and motivation for improvement].

Authors:  P Regitnig; A Nader; H Wiener
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Cancer of the cervix - from bleak past to bright future; a review, with an emphasis on cancer of the cervix in malaysia.

Authors:  Othman Nor Hayati
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2003-01

3.  Preoperative cervical cytology as a prognostic factor in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer: A single-center experience from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ahmed Abu-Zaid; Mohannad Alsabban; Osama Alomar; Mohammed Abuzaid; Mohammed Z Jamjoom; Hany Salem; Ismail A Al-Badawi
Journal:  Avicenna J Med       Date:  2020-07-03

4.  Impact of New Collecting Instruments on Satisfactory Cervical Cytology in a Diagnostic Reference Center at Mexico City.

Authors:  Carlos Manuel Ortiz-Mendoza
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2021-05-29

5.  Comparison of vaginal microbiota sampling techniques: cytobrush versus swab.

Authors:  Anita Mitra; David A MacIntyre; Vishakha Mahajan; Yun S Lee; Ann Smith; Julian R Marchesi; Deirdre Lyons; Phillip R Bennett; Maria Kyrgiou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Comparison of Papanicolaou Smear Quality with the Anatomical Spatula and the Cytobrush-Spatula: A Single-Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kabiru Afolarin Rabiu; Ugochi O Nzeribe-Abangwu; Fatimat Motunrayo Akinlusi; Taiwo Ganiyat Alausa; Idayat Adejumoke Durojaiye
Journal:  Niger Med J       Date:  2019 May-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.