Literature DB >> 10796263

Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks gestation).

L Bricker1, J P Neilson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic ultrasound is used selectively in late pregnancy where there are specific clinical indications. However, the value of routine late pregnancy ultrasound screening in unselected populations is controversial. The rationale for such screening would be the detection of clinical conditions which place the fetus or mother at high risk, which would not necessarily have been detected by other means such as clinical examination, and for which subsequent management would improve perinatal outcome.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects on obstetric practice and pregnancy outcome of routine late pregnancy ultrasound, defined as greater than 24 weeks gestation, in women with either unselected or low risk pregnancies. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Specialised Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: All acceptably controlled trials of routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (defined as after 24 weeks). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The principal reviewer assessed trial quality and extracted data, under supervision of the co-reviewer. MAIN
RESULTS: Seven trials recruiting 25,036 women were included. The quality of trials overall was satisfactory. There was no difference in antenatal, obstetric and neonatal intervention or morbidity in screened versus control groups. Routine late pregnancy ultrasound was not associated with improvements in overall perinatal mortality. Placental grading as an adjunct to third trimester examination scan was associated with a significant reduction in the stillbirth rate in the one trial that assessed it. There is a lack of data with regard to long term substantive outcomes such as neurodevelopment. There is a lack of data on maternal psychological effects. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Based on existing evidence, routine late pregnancy ultrasound in low risk or unselected populations does not confer benefit on mother or baby. There is a lack of data about the potential psychological effects of routine ultrasound in late pregnancy, and the effects on both short and long term neonatal and childhood outcome. Placental grading in the third trimester may be valuable, but whether reported results are reproducible remains to be seen, and future research of late pregnancy ultrasound should include evaluation of placental textural assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10796263     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  6 in total

1.  Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China.

Authors:  Guo Sufang; Sabu S Padmadas; Zhao Fengmin; James J Brown; R William Stones
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks' gestation).

Authors:  Leanne Bricker; Nancy Medley; Jeremy J Pratt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-29

Review 3.  Screening and triage of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in general population and high risk pregnancies: a systematic review with a focus on reduction of IUGR related stillbirths.

Authors:  Aamer Imdad; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Saad Siddiqui; Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  High risk of unexpected late fetal death in monochorionic twins despite intensive ultrasound surveillance: a cohort study.

Authors:  Olivia Barigye; Lucia Pasquini; Paula Galea; Helen Chambers; Lucy Chappell; Nicholas M Fisk
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Protocol for the prospective observational clinical study: estimation of fetal weight by MRI to PREdict neonatal MACROsomia (PREMACRO study) and small-for-gestational age neonates.

Authors:  Caroline Kadji; Mieke M Cannie; Andrew Carlin; Jacques C Jani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Study protocol. A prospective cohort study of unselected primiparous women: the pregnancy outcome prediction study.

Authors:  Dharmintra Pasupathy; Alison Dacey; Emma Cook; D Stephen Charnock-Jones; Ian R White; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.