D J Henderson-Smart1, D A Osborn. 1. NSW Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, Queen Elizabeth II Institute for Mothers and Infants, Building DO2, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006. dhs@mail.usyd.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia, which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation or other treatments. Physical stimulation is often used to restart breathing and it is possible that repeated stimulation, such as with an oscillating mattress (kinesthetic stimulation), might prevent apnea and its consequences. OBJECTIVES: In preterm infants at risk for apnea, does prophylactic use of kinesthetic stimulation lead to a clinically important reduction in apnea and bradycardia, and use of intemittent positive preswsure ventilation (IPPV). SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of the Oxford Database of Perinatal trials, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal handsearching mainly in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials in preterm infants at risk of developing clinical apnea which utilised random or quasi-random allocation to treatment with an oscillating mattress or control, were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by each author and synthesis of the data using relative risk. MAIN RESULTS: There were no differences in short term effects (apnea /bradycardia, IVH, use of IPPV, sleep/wake cycles and neurological status at discharge) or longterm effects (in one trial - growth and development to one year). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Implications for practice. Prophylactic use of kinesthetic stimulation cannot be recommended to reduce apnea/bradycardia in preterm infants. Implications for research. There are currently no clear research questions regarding prophylactic use of kinesthetic stimulation to prevent apnea in preterm infants.
BACKGROUND: Recurrent apnea is common in preterm infants, particularly at very early gestational ages. These episodes of loss of effective breathing can lead to hypoxemia and bradycardia, which may be severe enough to require resuscitation including use of positive pressure ventilation or other treatments. Physical stimulation is often used to restart breathing and it is possible that repeated stimulation, such as with an oscillating mattress (kinesthetic stimulation), might prevent apnea and its consequences. OBJECTIVES: In preterm infants at risk for apnea, does prophylactic use of kinesthetic stimulation lead to a clinically important reduction in apnea and bradycardia, and use of intemittent positive preswsure ventilation (IPPV). SEARCH STRATEGY: The standard search strategy of the Neonatal Review Group was used. This included searches of the Oxford Database of Perinatal trials, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, previous reviews including cross references, abstracts, conferences and symposia proceedings, expert informants, journal handsearching mainly in the English language. SELECTION CRITERIA: All trials in preterm infants at risk of developing clinical apnea which utilised random or quasi-random allocation to treatment with an oscillating mattress or control, were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used with separate evaluation of trial quality and data extraction by each author and synthesis of the data using relative risk. MAIN RESULTS: There were no differences in short term effects (apnea /bradycardia, IVH, use of IPPV, sleep/wake cycles and neurological status at discharge) or longterm effects (in one trial - growth and development to one year). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Implications for practice. Prophylactic use of kinesthetic stimulation cannot be recommended to reduce apnea/bradycardia in preterm infants. Implications for research. There are currently no clear research questions regarding prophylactic use of kinesthetic stimulation to prevent apnea in preterm infants.