Literature DB >> 10796195

Enemas during labor.

L G Cuervo1, M N Rodríguez, M B Delgado.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of enemas during labor usually depends on the preference of the attending physician and available resources. However enemas cause discomfort in women and increase the costs of delivery.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of enemas during the first stage of labor on infection rates in mothers and newborns, duration of labor, perineal wound dehiscence in the mother, perineal pain, faecal soiling and costs. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, Medline and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials in which an enema was administered during the first stage of labor and which included assessment of possible neonatal or puerperal morbidity or mortality. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Selected studies were assessed by three reviewers independently. MAIN
RESULTS: Two trials involving 665 women were included. These showed no clear difference in infection rates for puerperal mothers (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 1.04) or newborn children. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: There is not enough evidence to evaluate the use of routine enemas during the first stage of labor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10796195     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  7 in total

Review 1.  Enemas during labour.

Authors:  Ludovic Reveiz; Hernando G Gaitán; Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-22

2.  Impact of increasing capacity for generating and using research on maternal and perinatal health practices in South East Asia (SEA-ORCHID Project).

Authors:  P Lumbiganon; S J McDonald; M Laopaiboon; T Turner; S Green; C A Crowther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evidence-informed obstetric practice during normal birth in China: trends and influences in four hospitals.

Authors:  Xu Qian; Helen Smith; Hong Liang; Ji Liang; Paul Garner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Effects of high volume saline enemas vs no enema during labour--The N-Ma Randomised Controlled Trial [ISRCTN43153145].

Authors:  Luis Gabriel Cuervo; María Del Pilar Bernal; Natalia Mendoza
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2006-03-19       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Optimising reproductive and child health outcomes by building evidence-based research and practice in South East Asia (SEA-ORCHID): study protocol.

Authors:  David J Henderson-Smart; Pisake Lumbiganon; Mario R Festin; Jacqueline J Ho; Hakimi Mohammad; Steve J McDonald; Sally Green; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Use of evidence-based practices in pregnancy and childbirth: South East Asia Optimising Reproductive and Child Health in Developing Countries project.

Authors:  M Laopaiboon; P Lumbiganon; S J McDonald; D J Henderson-Smart; S Green; C A Crowther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparing the outcomes of physiologic delivery with non-physiologic delivery group.

Authors:  Nasrin Soufizadeh; Farnaz Zandvakili; Fariba Farhadifar; Fariba Seyedoshohadaie
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.