W J Prendiville1, D Elbourne, S McDonald. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coombe Lying-In Hospital, Dolphin's Barn, Dublin 8, Ireland. wprendiville@tinet.ie
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Expectant management of the third stage of labour involves allowing the placenta to deliver spontaneously or aiding by gravity or nipple stimulation. Active management involves administration of a prophylactic oxytocic after delivery, early cord clamping and cutting, and controlled cord traction of the umbilical cord. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of active versus expectant management on blood loss, post partum haemorrhage and other maternal and perinatal complications of the third stage of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing active and expectant management of the third stage of labour in women with singleton pregnancies whose babies were presenting head first and who were expecting a vaginal delivery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by the reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies were included. Three of the trials were of good quality. Compared to expectant management, active management (in the setting of a maternity hospital) was associated with the following reduced risks: maternal blood loss (weighted mean difference -79.33 millilitres, 95% confidence interval -94.29 to -64. 37); post partum haemorrhage of more than 500 millilitres (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.41); prolonged third stage of labour (weighted mean difference -3.40 minutes, 95% confidence interval -4.66 to -2.13). Active management was associated with an increased risk of maternal nausea (odds ratio 1. 95, 95% confidence interval 1.58 to 2.42), vomiting and raised blood pressure (probably due to the use of ergometrine). No advantages or disadvantages were apparent for the baby. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Routine 'active management' is superior to 'expectant management' in terms of blood loss, post partum haemorrhage and other serious complications of the third stage of labour. Active managment is, however, associated with an increased risk of unpleasant side effects (eg nausea and vomiting), and hypertension, where ergometrine is used. Active management should be the routine management of choice for women expecting a single baby by vaginal delivery in a maternity hospital. The implications are less clear for other settings including domiciliary practice (in developing and industrialised countries).
BACKGROUND: Expectant management of the third stage of labour involves allowing the placenta to deliver spontaneously or aiding by gravity or nipple stimulation. Active management involves administration of a prophylactic oxytocic after delivery, early cord clamping and cutting, and controlled cord traction of the umbilical cord. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of active versus expectant management on blood loss, post partum haemorrhage and other maternal and perinatal complications of the third stage of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing active and expectant management of the third stage of labour in women with singleton pregnancies whose babies were presenting head first and who were expecting a vaginal delivery. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by the reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Four studies were included. Three of the trials were of good quality. Compared to expectant management, active management (in the setting of a maternity hospital) was associated with the following reduced risks: maternal blood loss (weighted mean difference -79.33 millilitres, 95% confidence interval -94.29 to -64. 37); post partum haemorrhage of more than 500 millilitres (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.41); prolonged third stage of labour (weighted mean difference -3.40 minutes, 95% confidence interval -4.66 to -2.13). Active management was associated with an increased risk of maternal nausea (odds ratio 1. 95, 95% confidence interval 1.58 to 2.42), vomiting and raised blood pressure (probably due to the use of ergometrine). No advantages or disadvantages were apparent for the baby. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Routine 'active management' is superior to 'expectant management' in terms of blood loss, post partum haemorrhage and other serious complications of the third stage of labour. Active managment is, however, associated with an increased risk of unpleasant side effects (eg nausea and vomiting), and hypertension, where ergometrine is used. Active management should be the routine management of choice for women expecting a single baby by vaginal delivery in a maternity hospital. The implications are less clear for other settings including domiciliary practice (in developing and industrialised countries).
Authors: Cynthia Stanton; Deborah Armbruster; Rod Knight; Iwan Ariawan; Sourou Gbangbade; Ashebir Getachew; Jose Angel Portillo; Douglas Jarquin; Flor Marin; Sayoka Mfinanga; Jesus Vallecillo; Hope Johnson; David Sintasath Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Cynthia K Stanton; Samuel Newton; Luke C Mullany; Patience Cofie; Charlotte Tawiah Agyemang; Edward Adiibokah; Niamh Darcy; Sadaf Khan; Alice Levisay; John Gyapong; Deborah Armbruster; Seth Owusu-Agyei Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Godfrey S Mfinanga; Godfather D Kimaro; Esther Ngadaya; Sirili Massawe; Rugola Mtandu; Elizabeth H Shayo; Amos Kahwa; Ominde Achola; Alice Mutungi; Rod Knight; Deborah Armbruster; David Sintasath; Andrew Kitua; Cynthia Stanton Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2009-04-16