Literature DB >> 10795987

EEG dipole source localization using artificial neural networks.

G Van Hoey1, J De Clercq, B Vanrumste, R Van De Walle, I Lemahieu, M D'Havé, P Boon.   

Abstract

Localization of focal electrical activity in the brain using dipole source analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG), is usually performed by iteratively determining the location and orientation of the dipole source, until optimal correspondence is reached between the dipole source and the measured potential distribution on the head. In this paper, we investigate the use of feed-forward layered artificial neural networks (ANNs) to replace the iterative localization procedure, in order to decrease the calculation time. The localization accuracy of the ANN approach is studied within spherical and realistic head models. Additionally, we investigate the robustness of both the iterative and the ANN approach by observing the influence on the localization error of both noise in the scalp potentials and scalp electrode mislocalizations. Finally, after choosing the ANN structure and size that provides a good trade off between low localization errors and short computation times, we compare the calculation times involved with both the iterative and ANN methods. An average localization error of about 3.5 mm is obtained for both spherical and realistic head models. Moreover, the ANN localization approach appears to be robust to noise and electrode mislocations. In comparison with the iterative localization, the ANN provides a major speed-up of dipole source localization. We conclude that an artificial neural network is a very suitable alternative for iterative dipole source localization in applications where large numbers of dipole localizations have to be performed, provided that an increase of the localization errors by a few millimetres is acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10795987     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Fast robust subject-independent magnetoencephalographic source localization using an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Sung Chan Jun; Barak A Pearlmutter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A hybrid algorithm for solving the EEG inverse problem from spatio-temporal EEG data.

Authors:  Guillaume Crevecoeur; Hans Hallez; Peter Van Hese; Yves D'Asseler; Luc Dupré; Rik Van de Walle
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Spontaneous default mode network phase-locking moderates performance perceptions under stereotype threat.

Authors:  Chad E Forbes; Jordan B Leitner; Kelly Duran-Jordan; Adam B Magerman; Toni Schmader; John J B Allen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Deep neural networks constrained by neural mass models improve electrophysiological source imaging of spatiotemporal brain dynamics.

Authors:  Rui Sun; Abbas Sohrabpour; Gregory A Worrell; Bin He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Explosive transitions to synchronization in networks of frequency dipoles.

Authors:  Liuhua Zhu; Shu Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  ConvDip: A Convolutional Neural Network for Better EEG Source Imaging.

Authors:  Lukas Hecker; Rebekka Rupprecht; Ludger Tebartz Van Elst; Jürgen Kornmeier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  Review on solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis.

Authors:  Roberta Grech; Tracey Cassar; Joseph Muscat; Kenneth P Camilleri; Simon G Fabri; Michalis Zervakis; Petros Xanthopoulos; Vangelis Sakkalis; Bart Vanrumste
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.262

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.