Literature DB >> 10795981

Evaluation of the validity of a convolution method for incorporating tumour movement and set-up variations into the radiotherapy treatment planning system.

S D McCarter1, W A Beckham.   

Abstract

Modern radiotherapy techniques have developed to a point where the ability to conform to a particular tumour shape is limited by organ motion and set-up variations. The result is that dose distributions displayed by treatment planning systems based on static beam modelling are not representative of the dose received by the patient during a fractionated course of radiotherapy. The convolution-based method to account for these variations in radiation treatment planning systems has been suggested in previous work. The validity of the convolution method is tested by comparing the dose distribution obtained from this convolution method with the dose distribution obtained by summing the contribution to the total dose from each fraction of a fractionated treatment (for increasing numbers of fractions) and simulating random target position variations between fractions. For larger numbers of fractions (approximately or > 15) which are the norm for radical treatment schemes, it is clear that incorporation of movement by a convolution method could potentially produce a more accurate dose distribution. There are some limitations that have been identified, however, especially in relation to the heterogeneous nature of patient tissues, which require further investigation before the technique could be applied clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10795981     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/4/308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of dosimetric margins in prostate IMRT treatment plans.

Authors:  J J Gordon; J V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Quantifying Allowable Motion to Achieve Safe Dose Escalation in Pancreatic SBRT.

Authors:  Yijun Ding; Warren G Campbell; Moyed Miften; Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy; Karyn A Goodman; Tracey Schefter; Bernard L Jones
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-04-02

3.  Assessment of intrafractional prostate motion and its dosimetric impact in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy with gating.

Authors:  Yuqing Xiong; Moritz Rabe; Lukas Nierer; Maria Kawula; Stefanie Corradini; Claus Belka; Marco Riboldi; Guillaume Landry; Christopher Kurz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Quantifying the interplay effect in prostate IMRT delivery using a convolution-based method.

Authors:  Haisen S Li; Indrin J Chetty; Timothy D Solberg
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Biological impact of geometric uncertainties: what margin is needed for intra-hepatic tumors?

Authors:  Hsiang-Chi Kuo; Wen-Shan Liu; Andrew Wu; Dennis Mah; Keh-Shih Chuang; Linda Hong; Ravi Yaparpalvi; Chandan Guha; Shalom Kalnicki
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Robust optimization of VMAT for lung cancer: Dosimetric implications of motion compensation techniques.

Authors:  Ben R Archibald-Heeren; Mikel V Byrne; Yunfei Hu; Meng Cai; Yang Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Influence of increased target dose inhomogeneity on margins for breathing motion compensation in conformal stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Authors:  Anne Richter; Kurt Baier; Juergen Meyer; Juergen Wilbert; Thomas Krieger; Michael Flentje; Matthias Guckenberger
Journal:  BMC Med Phys       Date:  2008-12-03

8.  Effect of audio instruction on tracking errors using a four-dimensional image-guided radiotherapy system.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Akira Sawada; Nobutaka Mukumoto; Kunio Takahashi; Takashi Mizowaki; Masaki Kokubo; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.