Literature DB >> 10795795

Measurement of daily walking distance-questionnaire versus pedometer.

D R Bassett1, A L Cureton, B E Ainsworth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared measurements of daily walking distance on the College Alumnus questionnaire (CAQ) and a pedometer.
METHODS: A total of 96 men and women (25-70 yr of age) with a wide range of physical activity habits were studied. Physical activity index was computed from the College Alumnus questionnaire (PAI-CAQ) as the sum of the energy expended in stair climbing, walking, and sports and recreational physical activity. Data on walking distance were compared with values obtained from the Yamax electronic pedometer (DW-500B). Participants wore the pedometer for 7 consecutive days, except when sleeping, showering, or performing sports and recreational activities.
RESULTS: Subjects underestimated their daily walking distance on the CAQ, compared with the pedometer (1.43 +/- 1.01 vs 4.17 +/- 1.61 km x d(-1)). The energy expended in walking was correspondingly lower on the CAQ, compared with the pedometer-derived values (555 +/- 405 versus 1608 +/- 640 kcal x wk(-1)).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that electronic pedometers are useful for examining questions about walking distance on physical activity questionnaires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10795795     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200005000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  51 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and opportunities for measuring physical activity in sedentary adults.

Authors:  C E Tudor-Locke; A M Myers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Effect of daily walking steps on ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus in elderly Japanese women.

Authors:  J Kitagawa; F Omasu; Y Nakahara
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  How many steps/day are enough? Preliminary pedometer indices for public health.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; David R Bassett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Joel E Williams; Jared P Reis; Delores Pluto
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Measurement of human energy expenditure, with particular reference to field studies: an historical perspective.

Authors:  Roy J Shephard; Yukitoshi Aoyagi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Physical activity questionnaires for adults: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Mireille N M van Poppel; Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  The relationship between physical activity and low back pain outcomes: a systematic review of observational studies.

Authors:  Paul Hendrick; S Milosavljevic; L Hale; D A Hurley; S McDonough; B Ryan; G D Baxter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Physical activity in epidemiology: moving from questionnaire to objective measurement.

Authors:  K F Janz
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Ambulatory physical activity profiles of older adults.

Authors:  Scott J Strath; Ann M Swartz; Susan E Cashin
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.961

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.