Literature DB >> 10795341

Cancer risk estimation for mixtures of coal tars and benzo(a)pyrene.

D W Gaylor1, S J Culp, L S Goldstein, F A Beland.   

Abstract

Two-year chronic bioassays were conducted by using B6C3F1 female mice fed several concentrations of two different mixtures of coal tars from manufactured gas waste sites or benzo(a)pyrene (BaP). The purpose of the study was to obtain estimates of cancer potency of coal tar mixtures, by using conventional regulatory methods, for use in manufactured gas waste site remediation. A secondary purpose was to investigate the validity of using the concentration of a single potent carcinogen, in this case benzo(a)pyrene, to estimate the relative risk for a coal tar mixture. The study has shown that BaP dominates the cancer risk when its concentration is greater than 6,300 ppm in the coal tar mixture. In this case the most sensitive tissue site is the forestomach. Using low-dose linear extrapolation, the lifetime cancer risk for humans is estimated to be: Risk < 1.03 x 10(-4) (ppm coal tar in total diet) + 240 x 10(-4) (ppm BaP in total diet), based on forestomach tumors. If the BaP concentration in the coal tar mixture is less than 6,300 ppm, the more likely case, then lung tumors provide the largest estimated upper limit of risk, Risk < 2.55 x 10(-4) (ppm coal tar in total diet), with no contribution of BaP to lung tumors. The upper limit of the cancer potency (slope factor) for lifetime oral exposure to benzo(a)pyrene is 1.2 x 10(-3) per microgram per kg body weight per day from this Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) study compared with the current value of 7.3 x 10(-3) per microgram per kg body weight per day listed in the U.S. EPA Integrated Risk Information System.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10795341     DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  5 in total

1.  The Long Goodbye: Finally Moving on from the Relative Potency Approach to a Mixtures Approach for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs).

Authors:  Lynne T Haber; Alison M Pecquet; Melissa J Vincent; Louise M White
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  To BaP or not to BaP? That is the question.

Authors:  L S Goldstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Application of benzo(a)pyrene and coal tar tumor dose-response data to a modified benchmark dose method of guideline development.

Authors:  D James Fitzgerald; Neville I Robinson; Beverly A Pester
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Biochar production increases the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content in surrounding soils and potential cancer risk.

Authors:  Marcin Kuśmierz; Patryk Oleszczuk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The characterization of flavored hookahs aroma profile and in response to heating as analyzed via headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and chemometrics.

Authors:  Mohamed A Farag; Moamen M Elmassry; Sherweit H El-Ahmady
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.