PURPOSE: To compare visual results and quality of vision of two multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL): SA 40 N silicone zonal-progressive multifocal IOL and P 359 TUV PMMA bifocal IOL. METHODS: 46 eyes were operated on for cataract. 24 IOL SA 40 N (group 1) and 22 IOL P 359 (group 2) were implanted. Evaluation of visual results was performed between the first and the third month postoperatively. The quality of vision was explored in both groups by using two tests of contrast sensitivity, an automated visual field and a questionnaire dealing with patient satisfaction and presence of halos and glare. RESULTS: Postoperatively, a myopic shift was noted with a statistical significant difference in the group 2 (p<0.05). The predictability was good in both groups (mean refractive error<1 D). Mean corrected distance visual acuity was similar in-groups 1 and 2 (0.6). Mean distance-corrected near visual acuity was statistically better in the group 2 (p<0.05). We noted in both groups a loss of contrast sensitivity statistically more important in the group 2 (p<0.001). Where the automated perimetry is concerned, no statistical differences were encountered. 35% of patients (group 1) and 29% (group 2) were very satisfied with the results of their surgery. Halos and glare were noted in 8% (group 1) and 9% (group 2) of the patients. CONCLUSION: The new concept of multifocality is increasing in practice of cataract surgery because of the reduction of spectacle dependency and the high level of patient satisfaction. However, the occurrence of halos and glare suggest a limitation of these indications of multifocal IOL, particularly for night driving patients.
PURPOSE: To compare visual results and quality of vision of two multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL): SA 40 N silicone zonal-progressive multifocal IOL and P 359 TUV PMMA bifocal IOL. METHODS: 46 eyes were operated on for cataract. 24 IOL SA 40 N (group 1) and 22 IOL P 359 (group 2) were implanted. Evaluation of visual results was performed between the first and the third month postoperatively. The quality of vision was explored in both groups by using two tests of contrast sensitivity, an automated visual field and a questionnaire dealing with patient satisfaction and presence of halos and glare. RESULTS: Postoperatively, a myopic shift was noted with a statistical significant difference in the group 2 (p<0.05). The predictability was good in both groups (mean refractive error<1 D). Mean corrected distance visual acuity was similar in-groups 1 and 2 (0.6). Mean distance-corrected near visual acuity was statistically better in the group 2 (p<0.05). We noted in both groups a loss of contrast sensitivity statistically more important in the group 2 (p<0.001). Where the automated perimetry is concerned, no statistical differences were encountered. 35% of patients (group 1) and 29% (group 2) were very satisfied with the results of their surgery. Halos and glare were noted in 8% (group 1) and 9% (group 2) of the patients. CONCLUSION: The new concept of multifocality is increasing in practice of cataract surgery because of the reduction of spectacle dependency and the high level of patient satisfaction. However, the occurrence of halos and glare suggest a limitation of these indications of multifocal IOL, particularly for night driving patients.
Authors: Diego Zamora-de La Cruz; Karla Zúñiga-Posselt; John Bartlett; Mario Gutierrez; Samuel A Abariga Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-06-18