Literature DB >> 10794372

Biased information search in group decision making.

S Schulz-Hardt1, D Frey, C Lüthgens, S Moscovici.   

Abstract

Research has shown that people prefer supporting to conflicting information when making decisions. Whether this biased information search also occurs in group decision making was examined in three experiments. Experiment 1 indicated that groups as well as individuals prefer supporting information and that the strength of this bias depends on the distribution of the group members' initial decision preferences. The more group members had chosen the same alternative prior to the group discussion (group homogeneity), the more strongly the group preferred information supporting that alternative. Experiment 2 replicated these results with managers. Experiment 3 showed that the differences between homogeneous and heterogeneous groups reflect group-level processes. Higher commitment and confidence in homogeneous groups mediated this effect. Functional and dysfunctional aspects of biased information seeking in group decision making are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10794372     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.4.655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  7 in total

1.  Biases in the production and reception of collective knowledge: the case of hindsight bias in Wikipedia.

Authors:  Aileen Oeberst; Ina von der Beck; Mitja D Back; Ulrike Cress; Steffen Nestler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-17

2.  How humans learn and represent networks.

Authors:  Christopher W Lynn; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Feeling validated versus being correct: a meta-analysis of selective exposure to information.

Authors:  William Hart; Dolores Albarracín; Alice H Eagly; Inge Brechan; Matthew J Lindberg; Lisa Merrill
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Why and When Team Reflexivity Contributes to Team Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model.

Authors:  Mengxi Yang; Hilary Schloemer; Zheng Zhu; Yuying Lin; Wansi Chen; Niannian Dong
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-21

5.  Stochasticity, Nonlinear Value Functions, and Update Rules in Learning Aesthetic Biases.

Authors:  Norberto M Grzywacz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Influence of framing on medical decision making.

Authors:  Jingjing Gong; Yan Zhang; Jun Feng; Yonghua Huang; Yazhou Wei; Weiwei Zhang
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.068

7.  Establishing a Scientific Consensus on the Cognitive Benefits of Physical Activity.

Authors:  Nesrin Nazlieva; Myrto-Foteini Mavilidi; Martine Baars; Fred Paas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.