Literature DB >> 10794081

The presence of rudimentary odontogenic structures in the mouse embryonic mandible requires reinterpretation of developmental control of first lower molar histomorphogenesis.

L Viriot1, H Lesot, J L Vonesch, J V Ruch, M Peterka, R Peterková.   

Abstract

In the mouse embryonic maxilla, rudimentary tooth primordia have been identified, which can be mistaken for the first upper molar. In order to determine whether such a situation might exist in the lower jaw as well, tooth development was investigated in the mouse mandibular cheek region during ED 12.5-15.0. A combination of histology, morphometry and computer-aided 3D reconstructions demonstrated the existence of rudimentary dental structures, whose gradual appearance and regression was associated with the segmental progress of odontogenesis along the mesio-distal axis of the jaw: 1) At ED 12.5, the mesial segment (MS) was the most prominent part of the dental epithelial invagination. It included an asymmetrically budding dental lamina. The MS, although generally mistaken for the lower first molar (M1, primordium, regressed and did not finally participate in M1 cap formation. 2) At ED 13.5, a wide dental bud (called segment R2) appeared distally to the MS. Although the R2 segment transiently represented the predominant part of the dental epithelium at ED13.5, it participated only in the formation of the mesial end of the M1 cap. 3) The top of the R2 segment at ED13.5 was not the precursor of the enamel knot (EK), contrary to what has been assumed. 4) The central segment of the M1 cap as well as the EK developed later and distally to the R2 segment. 5) Time-space specific apoptosis correlated with the retardation in growth of the R2 segment as well as with strong regressive changes in the epithelium situated mesially to it. These highlight the need to reinterpret current molecular data on early M1 development in the mouse in order to correlate the expression of signalling molecules with specific morphogenetic events in the appropriate antemolar or molar segments of the embryonic mandible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10794081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dev Biol        ISSN: 0214-6282            Impact factor:   2.203


  16 in total

1.  Inhibition of Wnt signaling by Wise (Sostdc1) and negative feedback from Shh controls tooth number and patterning.

Authors:  Youngwook Ahn; Brian W Sanderson; Ophir D Klein; Robb Krumlauf
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Patterning by heritage in mouse molar row development.

Authors:  Jan Prochazka; Sophie Pantalacci; Svatava Churava; Michaela Rothova; Anne Lambert; Hervé Lesot; Ophir Klein; Miroslav Peterka; Vincent Laudet; Renata Peterkova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Lineage tracing of epithelial cells in developing teeth reveals two strategies for building signaling centers.

Authors:  Wei Du; Jimmy Kuang-Hsien Hu; Wen Du; Ophir D Klein
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Exogenous fibroblast growth factor 8 rescues development of mouse diastemal vestigial tooth ex vivo.

Authors:  Lu Li; Guohua Yuan; Chao Liu; Lu Zhang; Yanding Zhang; YiPing Chen; Zhi Chen
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.780

Review 5.  Current knowledge of tooth development: patterning and mineralization of the murine dentition.

Authors:  Javier Catón; Abigail S Tucker
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Revitalization of a diastemal tooth primordium in Spry2 null mice results from increased proliferation and decreased apoptosis.

Authors:  Renata Peterkova; Svatava Churava; Herve Lesot; Michaela Rothova; Jan Prochazka; Miroslav Peterka; Ophir D Klein
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.656

7.  Phenotypic and evolutionary implications of modulating the ERK-MAPK cascade using the dentition as a model.

Authors:  Pauline Marangoni; Cyril Charles; Paul Tafforeau; Virginie Laugel-Haushalter; Adriane Joo; Agnès Bloch-Zupan; Ophir D Klein; Laurent Viriot
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Sprouty gene dosage influences temporal-spatial dynamics of primary enamel knot formation.

Authors:  Katerina Lochovska; Renata Peterkova; Zuzana Pavlikova; Maria Hovorakova
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 9.  Role of Cell Death in Cellular Processes During Odontogenesis.

Authors:  John Abramyan; Poongodi Geetha-Loganathan; Marie Šulcová; Marcela Buchtová
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Evolutionary and biological implications of dental mesial drift in rodents: the case of the Ctenodactylidae (Rodentia, Mammalia).

Authors:  Helder Gomes Rodrigues; Floréal Solé; Cyril Charles; Paul Tafforeau; Monique Vianey-Liaud; Laurent Viriot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.