STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The intraoral palpation technique of the inferior belly of the inferior lateral pterygoid (ILP) muscle is a standard diagnostic examination method for temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome, although different studies have revealed inconsistent results. PURPOSE: This study assessed the feasibility of the ILP muscle palpation by a simulated clinical setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three dentists performed a bilateral palpation of the ILP muscle in 53 fresh and unfixed human cadavers and decided whether the muscle was palpable or unpalpable. In a second step, it was observed through the dissected infratemporal fossa, whether the examiner's finger did or did not touch the ILP muscle by simulating the performed palpation. Palpatory findings were supplemented by 1-dimensional measurements for determination of topographic relations of the ILP muscle within the infratemporal fossa. For statistical analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the palpation technique were calculated. Interexaminer agreement was estimated with the kappa value. RESULTS: In 86 of 106 dissected specimens, a superficial fascicle of the medial pterygoid muscle was found in direct proximity to the ILP muscle. In these cases, a residual distance of 7.8 +/- 3.2 mm remained between the ILP muscle and buccinator fascia indented by the tip of the examiner's finger. In 10 of 20 specimens with an absent superficial fascicle, the finger was able to reach the ILP muscle. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that the ILP muscle palpation technique should no longer be considered as a standard clinical procedure because it is nearly impossible to palpate the ILP muscle anatomically and because the risk of false-positive findings (by palpation of the medial pterygoid muscle) is high.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The intraoral palpation technique of the inferior belly of the inferior lateral pterygoid (ILP) muscle is a standard diagnostic examination method for temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome, although different studies have revealed inconsistent results. PURPOSE: This study assessed the feasibility of the ILP muscle palpation by a simulated clinical setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three dentists performed a bilateral palpation of the ILP muscle in 53 fresh and unfixed human cadavers and decided whether the muscle was palpable or unpalpable. In a second step, it was observed through the dissected infratemporal fossa, whether the examiner's finger did or did not touch the ILP muscle by simulating the performed palpation. Palpatory findings were supplemented by 1-dimensional measurements for determination of topographic relations of the ILP muscle within the infratemporal fossa. For statistical analysis, sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the palpation technique were calculated. Interexaminer agreement was estimated with the kappa value. RESULTS: In 86 of 106 dissected specimens, a superficial fascicle of the medial pterygoid muscle was found in direct proximity to the ILP muscle. In these cases, a residual distance of 7.8 +/- 3.2 mm remained between the ILP muscle and buccinator fascia indented by the tip of the examiner's finger. In 10 of 20 specimens with an absent superficial fascicle, the finger was able to reach the ILP muscle. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that the ILP muscle palpation technique should no longer be considered as a standard clinical procedure because it is nearly impossible to palpate the ILP muscle anatomically and because the risk of false-positive findings (by palpation of the medial pterygoid muscle) is high.
Authors: Eric L Schiffman; Richard Ohrbach; Edmond L Truelove; Feng Tai; Gary C Anderson; Wei Pan; Yoly M Gonzalez; Mike T John; Earl Sommers; Thomas List; Ana M Velly; Wenjun Kang; John O Look Journal: J Orofac Pain Date: 2010
Authors: Marina Fernandes de Sena; Késsia Suênia F de Mesquita; Fernanda Regina R Santos; Francisco Wanderley G P Silva; Kranya Victoria D Serrano Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr Date: 2013-12
Authors: Carolina Marciela Herpich; Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal-Junior; Fabiano Politti; Cid André Fidelis de Paula Gomes; Igor Phillip Dos Santos Glória; Maitê de Freitas Rocha de Souza Amaral; Graciela Herpich; Ludmila Menezes Alves de Azevedo; Tabajara de Oliveira Gonzalez; Daniela Aparecida Biasotto-Gonzalez Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2019-07-19 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: S M D'Ippolito; A M Borri Wolosker; G D'Ippolito; B Herbert de Souza; M Fenyo-Pereira Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Taís S Barbosa; Marina S Leme; Paula M Castelo; Maria Beatriz D Gavião Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Paulo César Rodrigues Conti; Rafael dos Santos Silva; Carlos dos Reis Pereira de Araujo; Leylha Maria N Rosseti; Shigueharu Yassuda; Renato Oliveira Ferreira da Silva; Luiz Fernando Pegoraro Journal: J Appl Oral Sci Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.698
Authors: Octavio Garaycochea; Peter Baptista; Marta Calvo-Imirizaldu; David Terrasa; Antonio Moffa; Manuele Casale; Juan Alcalde; Carlos O'Connor-Reina; Guillermo Plaza; Secundino Fernández Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 3.236
Authors: Aleli Tôrres Oliveira; Anderson Aparecido Camilo; Paulo Roberto Valle Bahia; Antonio Carlos Pires Carvalho; Marcos Fabio DosSantos; Jorge Vicente Lopes da Silva; André Antonio Monteiro Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-05-18 Impact factor: 3.411