Literature DB >> 10793302

Five-year self-management of weight using meal replacements: comparison with matched controls in rural Wisconsin.

D Quinn Rothacker1.   

Abstract

We compared 5-y weight changes of subjects after a self-managed meal-replacement weight-control program (MR) with that of matched control subjects in rural Wisconsin. Healthy but overweight females (n = 108) and males (n = 50) received free products and weighed in twice a year from 1992 through 1997. Weights from three area clinics were obtained from 1992 records for 528 healthy males and females, whose weights were again obtained in late 1997. In addition, 1997 weights were obtained on 378 area males and females who reported their 1992 weight by questionnaire. Three control subjects were then selected for each MR participant, matched for age (within 5 y), body mass index (within 2 kg/m(2)), sex, and race. After 5 y, 141 MR participants weighed in, 2 died, and 19 were excluded primarily because of pregnancy. The 50 males were -5.8+/-5.4 kg and the 84 females were -4.2+/-6.9 kg from their 1992 weights. Conversely, 142 matched male controls gained 6.7+/-10.2 kg and 247 female controls gained 6.5+/- 10.7 kg. In conclusion, success determinations of MR and other long-term weight-control programs should be made by comparing changes with matched controls as the background rate of weight gain becomes increasingly more significant the longer the study is run.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10793302     DOI: 10.1016/s0899-9007(99)00280-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrition        ISSN: 0899-9007            Impact factor:   4.008


  8 in total

1.  Portion-controlled meals provide increases in diet quality during weight loss and maintenance.

Authors:  L T Ptomey; E A Willis; J R Goetz; J Lee; A N Szabo-Reed; D K Sullivan; J E Donnelly
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.089

Review 2.  Cardiovascular effects of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Beamish; Torsten Olbers; Aaron S Kelly; Thomas H Inge
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Well-Established and Empirically Supported Behavioral Treatments for Migraine.

Authors:  Donald B Penzien; Megan B Irby; Todd A Smitherman; Jeanetta C Rains; Timothy T Houle
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2015-07

Review 4.  The Look AHEAD study: a description of the lifestyle intervention and the evidence supporting it.

Authors:  Thomas A Wadden; Delia Smith West; Linda Delahanty; John Jakicic; Jack Rejeski; Don Williamson; Robert I Berkowitz; David E Kelley; Christine Tomchee; James O Hill; Shiriki Kumanyika
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lisa M Davis; Christopher Coleman; Jessica Kiel; Joni Rampolla; Tammy Hutchisen; Laura Ford; Wayne S Andersen; Andrea Hanlon-Mitola
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.271

6.  Pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus when combined with portion control diet modifies the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  A K Gupta; S R Smith; F L Greenway; G A Bray
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.577

7.  Effect of Seyoeum on Obesity, Insulin Resistance, and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease of High-Fat Diet-Fed C57BL/6 Mice.

Authors:  Hyun-Young Na; Mi Hyeon Seol; Mia Kim; Byung-Cheol Lee
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Nutrient adequacy during weight loss interventions: a randomized study in women comparing the dietary intake in a meal replacement group with a traditional food group.

Authors:  Judith M Ashley; Holly Herzog; Sharon Clodfelter; Vicki Bovee; Jon Schrage; Chris Pritsos
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 3.271

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.