Literature DB >> 10793133

Response of Xenopus Cds1 in cell-free extracts to DNA templates with double-stranded ends.

Z Guo1, W G Dunphy.   

Abstract

Although homologues of the yeast checkpoint kinases Cds1 and Chk1 have been identified in various systems, the respective roles of these kinases in the responses to damaged and/or unreplicated DNA in vertebrates have not been delineated precisely. Likewise, it is largely unknown how damaged DNA and unreplicated DNA trigger the pathways that contain these effector kinases. We report that Xenopus Cds1 (Xcds1) is phosphorylated and activated by the presence of some simple DNA molecules with double-stranded ends in cell-free Xenopus egg extracts. Xcds1 is not affected by aphidicolin, an agent that induces DNA replication blocks. In contrast, Xenopus Chk1 (Xchk1) responds to DNA replication blocks but not to the presence of double-stranded DNA ends. Immunodepletion of Xcds1 (and/or Xchk1) from egg extracts did not attenuate the cell cycle delay induced by double-stranded DNA ends. These results imply that the cell cycle delay triggered by double-stranded DNA ends either does not involve Xcds1 or uses a factor(s) that can act redundantly with Xcds1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10793133      PMCID: PMC14865          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.11.5.1535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  50 in total

1.  Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216.

Authors:  C Y Peng; P R Graves; R S Thoma; Z Wu; A S Shaw; H Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25.

Authors:  Y Sanchez; C Wong; R S Thoma; R Richman; Z Wu; H Piwnica-Worms; S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Cdc25 mitotic inducer targeted by chk1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase.

Authors:  B Furnari; N Rhind; P Russell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Cyclin-dependent kinases: engines, clocks, and microprocessors.

Authors:  D O Morgan
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  DNA-replication checkpoint control at the Drosophila midblastula transition.

Authors:  O C Sibon; V A Stevenson; W E Theurkauf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-07-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Chk1 is a wee1 kinase in the G2 DNA damage checkpoint inhibiting cdc2 by Y15 phosphorylation.

Authors:  M J O'Connell; J M Raleigh; H M Verkade; P Nurse
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-02-03       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  The Drosophila grapes gene is related to checkpoint gene chk1/rad27 and is required for late syncytial division fidelity.

Authors:  P Fogarty; S D Campbell; R Abu-Shumays; B S Phalle; K R Yu; G L Uy; M L Goldberg; W Sullivan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene.

Authors:  N J Bentley; D A Holtzman; G Flaggs; K S Keegan; A DeMaggio; J C Ford; M Hoekstra; A M Carr
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-12-02       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Overexpression of a kinase-inactive ATR protein causes sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and defects in cell cycle checkpoints.

Authors:  W A Cliby; C J Roberts; K A Cimprich; C M Stringer; J R Lamb; S L Schreiber; S H Friend
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-01-02       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  A human homologue of the checkpoint kinase Cds1 directly inhibits Cdc25 phosphatase.

Authors:  A Blasina; I V de Weyer; M C Laus; W H Luyten; A E Parker; C H McGowan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-01-14       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  34 in total

1.  ATM activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the C terminus of Nbs1.

Authors:  Zhongsheng You; Charly Chahwan; Julie Bailis; Tony Hunter; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Site-specific phosphorylation of a checkpoint mediator protein controls its responses to different DNA structures.

Authors:  Hae Yong Yoo; Seong-Yun Jeong; William G Dunphy
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Undamaged DNA transmits and enhances DNA damage checkpoint signals in early embryos.

Authors:  Aimin Peng; Andrea L Lewellyn; James L Maller
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Aven-dependent activation of ATM following DNA damage.

Authors:  Jessie Yanxiang Guo; Ayumi Yamada; Taisuke Kajino; Judy Qiju Wu; Wanli Tang; Christopher D Freel; Junjie Feng; B Nelson Chau; Michael Zhuo Wang; Seth S Margolis; Hae Yong Yoo; Xiao-Fan Wang; William G Dunphy; Pablo M Irusta; J Marie Hardwick; Sally Kornbluth
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  G2 arrest in Xenopus oocytes depends on phosphorylation of cdc25 by protein kinase A.

Authors:  Brian C Duckworth; Jennifer S Weaver; Joan V Ruderman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Phosphorylation of serines 635 and 645 of human Rad17 is cell cycle regulated and is required for G(1)/S checkpoint activation in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  S Post; Y C Weng; K Cimprich; L B Chen; Y Xu; E Y Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Greatwall and Polo-like kinase 1 coordinate to promote checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Aimin Peng; Ling Wang; Laura A Fisher
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Regulation of Cdc2/cyclin B activation in Xenopus egg extracts via inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdc25C phosphatase by Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein [corrected] kinase II.

Authors:  James R A Hutchins; Dina Dikovskaya; Paul R Clarke
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Two distinct modes of ATR activation orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1.

Authors:  Bunsyo Shiotani; Hai Dang Nguyen; Pelle Håkansson; Alexandre Maréchal; Alice Tse; Hidetoshi Tahara; Lee Zou
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Replication initiation complex formation in the absence of nuclear function in Xenopus.

Authors:  Liliana Krasinska; Daniel Fisher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.