Literature DB >> 10792923

To nest communally or not to nest communally: a review of rodent communal nesting and nursing.

.   

Abstract

Communal nesting, the sharing of parental responsibilities between multiple individuals in a nest, is common in many rodents. Upon first glance, this behaviour seems to be selectively disadvantageous. Communal care not only involves energetic costs, but may also be subject to cheating behaviour. Despite abundant literature, many questions remain regarding advantages gained by females that form nesting groups. I discuss the communal nesting of eusocial, singular and plural breeding rodents. I first clarify the distinction between communal nesting and thermoregulatory huddling. I then review two major groups of hypotheses ('ecological constraints' and 'benefits of philopatry') that are used to explain the occurrence of communal nesting in rodents. Most likely, these hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. Regardless of the main selective pressure(s) acting on communal nesting, the indirect components of inclusive fitness that result from nest sharing most likely influence the formation and maintenance of communal nests. Communal nesting and nursing (the sharing of milk with nonoffspring) are under different selective regimes and thus, must be evaluated separately. I review adaptive and nonadaptive hypotheses for rodent communal nursing. I argue that communal nursing may not be adaptive as mothers may be forced to share milk with nonoffspring in large communal nests (i.e. communal nursing may be a cost associated with communal nesting). In conclusion, I propose directions for future study that may improve our understanding of communal nesting and nursing in the wild. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Year:  2000        PMID: 10792923     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  29 in total

1.  Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies.

Authors:  Dieter Lukas; Tim Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Factors affecting the daily rhythm of body temperature of captive mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus).

Authors:  M Séguy; M Perret
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 3.  The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups.

Authors:  Joan B Silk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Is it all in the family? The effects of early social structure on neural-behavioral systems of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster).

Authors:  G D Greenberg; J A van Westerhuyzen; K L Bales; B C Trainor
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Increased juvenile and adult body weights in BALB/cByJ mice reared in a communal nest.

Authors:  Kathleen M Heiderstadt; David A Blizard
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 6.  Intraspecific variation in social organization by genetic variation, developmental plasticity, social flexibility or entirely extrinsic factors.

Authors:  Carsten Schradin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Adult Olfactory Bulb Neurogenesis.

Authors:  Pierre-Marie Lledo; Matt Valley
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

8.  Communal nesting increases pup growth but has limited effects on adult behavior and neurophysiology in inbred mice.

Authors:  Kathleen M Heiderstadt; David J Vandenbergh; Joseph P Gyekis; David A Blizard
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Access to a high resource environment protects against accelerated maturation following early life stress: A translational animal model of high, medium and low security settings.

Authors:  Arielle R Strzelewicz; Evelyn Ordoñes Sanchez; Alejandro N Rondón-Ortiz; Anthony Raneri; Sydney T Famularo; Debra A Bangasser; Amanda C Kentner
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Beyond size-number trade-offs: clutch size as a maternal effect.

Authors:  Gregory P Brown; Richard Shine
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.