Literature DB >> 10792090

Failure patterns and hazard rates for failure suggest the cure of prostate cancer by external beam radiation.

A L Hanlon1, G E Hanks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present patterns of failure and hazard rates for failure that support the concept of cure for patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation (RT).
METHODS: Two patient groups are reported: 408 patients treated with RT alone and 63 patients treated with RT and short-term androgen deprivation (RT+AD). All patients were treated between March 1987 and March 1995 and had at least 4 years of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) follow-up. The median follow-up was 69 months for the RT alone group and 60 months for the RT+AD group. For each treatment group, biochemical control and hazard functions were estimated using the ASTRO consensus definition of failure and the life table method.
RESULTS: The 5 and 8-year biochemical control estimates were 60% and 59% for the RT alone group, respectively, with only two failures occurring after 5 years (1% of the total failures observed). Hazard function estimates indicated a maximum risk of failure at 12 to 36 months, tapering to a low rate at 4 years, with no failures observed after 6 years. The differences in the patterns of failure by PSA level revealed a maximum risk of failure at 12 to 24 months (median 28) for a pretreatment PSA level of less than 10 ng/mL, 12 to 36 months (median 25) for a pretreatment PSA level of 10 to 19.9 ng/mL, and 12 to 36 months (median 22) for a pretreatment PSA level of 20 ng/mL or greater. The latter group reached low levels of risk at 6 years in contrast to 4 years for the patients presenting with pretreatment PSA levels of less than 20 ng/mL. Similar patterns were observed when stratifying by stage and Gleason score: patients with a worse prognosis had the highest risk of failure earlier and achieved a low risk of failure later than patients with a more favorable prognosis. The patients in the RT+AD group had a different pattern of risk of failure, with the highest risk immediately after treatment, declining to a low risk of failure at 48 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with RT alone or RT+AD had little risk of failure after 4 to 6 years. Patients with a favorable prognosis achieved a low risk of failure sooner than high-risk patients when treated with RT alone. These results are consistent with the cure of prostate cancer by RT alone or RT+AD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10792090     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00605-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Flexible modeling of the hazard rate and treatment effects in long-term survival studies.

Authors:  Yolanda Hagar; James J Dignam; Vanja Dukic
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Radiation dose and late failures in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Peter B Morgan; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert G Uzzo; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  A Class of Semiparametric Mixture Cure Survival Models with Dependent Censoring.

Authors:  Megan Othus; Yi Li; Ram C Tiwari
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Change point-cure models with application to estimating the change-point effect of age of diagnosis among prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Megan Othus; Yi Li; Ram Tiwari
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 1.404

5.  Timing of biochemical failure and distant metastatic disease for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer after radiotherapy.

Authors:  Peter B Morgan; Alexandra L Hanlon; Eric M Horwitz; Mark K Buyyounouski; Robert G Uzzo; Alan Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.