Literature DB >> 10792087

African-American men and intention to adhere to recommended follow-up for an abnormal prostate cancer early detection examination result.

R E Myers1, T Hyslop, T A Wolf, D Burgh, E J Kunkel, O A Oyesanmi, G J Chodak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the intention of African-American men to have the recommended follow-up in the event of an abnormal prostate cancer early detection examination and to identify the variables that help to explain adherence intention.
METHODS: In the spring of 1995, we selected a random sample of 548 African-American men who were patients at the University of Chicago Health Service. The sample included men who were 40 to 70 years of age, did not have a personal history of prostate cancer, and had a working telephone number. A total of 413 men who completed the telephone survey received an invitation to consider undergoing a prostate cancer early detection examination. The survey provided data on personal background characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs related to prostate cancer and early detection. Respondents were asked whether they would choose to have the recommended follow-up in the event of an abnormal early detection examination result. Univariate and multivariate analyses of intention to have follow-up were performed.
RESULTS: An intention to have the recommended follow-up was reported by 77% of the survey respondents. The results of multivariate analyses revealed that the intention to have the follow-up was positively associated with education beyond high school (odds ratio [OR] 1.9); perceived self-efficacy related to prostate cancer screening (OR 2.1); the belief that prostate cancer can be cured (OR 3.3); the belief that prostate cancer screening should be done in the absence of prostate problems (OR 2.3); and physician support for prostate cancer screening (OR 2.1).
CONCLUSIONS: African-American men who have a high school education or less may be at risk of nonadherence to recommended follow-up. Adherence also may be low among men who do not have favorable views of early detection or do not perceive strong physician support for early detection. Research is needed to determine whether intention and other factors predict actual adherence to follow-up in this population group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10792087     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00588-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

1.  Factors influencing behavioral intention regarding prostate cancer screening among older African-American men.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Sally W Vernon; Suzanne L Havstad; Shirley A Thomas; Shawna D Davis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Prostate Cancer Education, Detection, and Follow-Up in a Community-Based Multiethnic Cohort of Medically Underserved Men.

Authors:  Omotola S Ashorobi; Jacqueline Frost; Xuemei Wang; Pamela Roberson; E Lin; Robert J Volk; David S Lopez; Lovell A Jones; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-08

3.  Understanding preventive behaviors among mid-Western African-American men: a pilot qualitative study of prostate screening.

Authors:  Idethia Shevon Harvey; Reginald J Alston
Journal:  J Mens Health       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 0.537

4.  FACT-G: reliability and validity of the Malayalam translation.

Authors:  B C Thomas; M Pandey; K Ramdas; P Sebastian; M K Nair
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Does educational printed material manage to change compliance with prostate cancer screening?

Authors:  Konstantinos Stamatiou; Andreas Skolarikos; Ioannis Heretis; Vaios Papadimitriou; Alevizos Alevizos; Georgios Ilias; Vasilissa Karanasiou; Anargiros Mariolis; Frank Sofras
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Cancer-specific beliefs and survival in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Hosanna Soler-Vilá; Robert Dubrow; Vivian I Franco; Andrea K Saathoff; Stanislav V Kasl; Beth A Jones
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Factors influencing perceptions of breast cancer genetic counseling among women in an urban health care system.

Authors:  Marvella E Ford; Sharon Hensley Alford; Diandra Britton; Beth McClary; Howard S Gordon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Association of cancer prevention awareness with esophageal cancer screening participation rates: Results from a population-based cancer screening program in rural China.

Authors:  Shangchun Jia; He Li; Hongmei Zeng; Rongshou Zheng; Jiang Li; Jufang Shi; Zhixun Yang; Maomao Cao; Wanqing Chen
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Understanding, beliefs and perspectives of Aboriginal people in Western Australia about cancer and its impact on access to cancer services.

Authors:  Shaouli Shahid; Lizzie Finn; Dawn Bessarab; Sandra C Thompson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.