Literature DB >> 10791854

Regional nodal basin control is not compromised by previous sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma.

J E Gershenwald1, R S Berman, G Porter, P F Mansfield, J E Lee, M I Ross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regional nodal basin control is an important goal of lymphadenectomy in the management of melanoma patients with nodal disease. The purpose of this study was to determine if previous sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy compromises the ultimate regional nodal control achieved by subsequent therapeutic lymph node dissection in melanoma patients with microscopic lymph node metastases.
METHODS: A surgical melanoma database and hospital records were reviewed for 602 patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent successful lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy between 1991 and 1997.
RESULTS: A total of 105 (17%) of 602 patients had histologically positive SLNs and were offered therapeutic lymphadenectomy; 101 (96%) underwent this procedure. Thirty-six patients (36%) developed recurrent melanoma at one or more sites. The median follow-up period was 30 months. Recurrence in the previously dissected nodal basin was observed in 10 patients (10%); none had recurrence at only that site. Nodal basin disease appeared after local/in-transit (n = 6) or distant (n = 1) failure in seven patients and, as a component of the first site of failure, simultaneously with local/in-transit (n = 2) or distant (n = 1) recurrence in three patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Nodal basin failure after lymphadenectomy in patients who underwent previous biopsy of a histologically positive SLN is primarily a function of aggressive locoregional disease rather than of contamination from previous surgery. Because regional nodal control was comparable with that in other series, we conclude that SLN biopsy with selective lymphadenectomy does not compromise regional nodal basin control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10791854     DOI: 10.1007/bf02523658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

1.  Gender-related differences in outcome for melanoma patients.

Authors:  Charles R Scoggins; Merrick I Ross; Douglas S Reintgen; R Dirk Noyes; James S Goydos; Peter D Beitsch; Marshall M Urist; Stephan Ariyan; Jeffrey J Sussman; Michael J Edwards; Anees B Chagpar; Robert C G Martin; Arnold J Stromberg; Lee Hagendoorn; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Improvement and persistent disparities in completion lymph node dissection: Lessons from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Brian S Chu; Wima Koffi; Richard S Hoehn; Audrey Ertel; Shimul A Shah; Syed A Ahmad; Jeffrey J Sussman; Heather B Neuman; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Outcome of patients with a positive sentinel lymph node who do not undergo completion lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Katherine S Panageas; Charlotte E Ariyan; Klaus J Busam; Mary Sue Brady; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma.

Authors:  Farin Amersi; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2007

Review 5.  Intraoperative mapping of sentinel lymph node metastases using a clinically translated ultrasmall silica nanoparticle.

Authors:  Michelle S Bradbury; Mohan Pauliah; Pat Zanzonico; Ulrich Wiesner; Snehal Patel
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2015-12-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.