Literature DB >> 10790828

A quantitative model of cellular elasticity based on tensegrity.

D Stamenović1, M F Coughlin.   

Abstract

A tensegrity structure composed of six struts interconnected with 24 elastic cables is used as a quantitative model of the steady-state elastic response of cells, with the struts and cables representing microtubules and actin filaments, respectively. The model is stretched uniaxially and the Young's modulus (E0) is obtained from the initial slope of the stress versus strain curve of an equivalent continuum. It is found that E0 is directly proportional to the pre-existing tension in the cables (or compression in the struts) and inversely proportional to the cable (or strut) length square. This relationship is used to predict the upper and lower bounds of E0 of cells, assuming that the cable tension equals the yield force of actin (approximately 400 pN) for the upper bound, and that the strut compression equals the critical buckling force of microtubules for the lower bound. The cable (or strut) length is determined from the assumption that model dimensions match the diameter of probes used in standard mechanical tests on cells. Predicted values are compared to reported data for the Young's modulus of various cells. If the probe diameter is greater than or equal to 3 microns, these data are closer to the lower bound than to the upper bound. This, in turn, suggests that microtubules of the CSK carry initial compression that exceeds their critical buckling force (order of 10(0)-10(1) pN), but is much smaller than the yield force of actin. If the probe diameter is less than or equal to 2 microns, experimental data fall outside the region defined by the upper and lower bounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10790828     DOI: 10.1115/1.429631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  15 in total

1.  Three-dimensional cellular deformation analysis with a two-photon magnetic manipulator workstation.

Authors:  Hayden Huang; Chen Y Dong; Hyuk-Sang Kwon; Jason D Sutin; Roger D Kamm; Peter T C So
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Mechanisms governing the visco-elastic responses of living cells assessed by foam and tensegrity models.

Authors:  P Cañadas; V M Laurent; P Chabrand; D Isabey; S Wendling-Mansuy
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A prestressed cable network model of the adherent cell cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Mark F Coughlin; Dimitrije Stamenović
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Isostaticity and controlled force transmission in the cytoskeleton: A model awaiting experimental evidence.

Authors:  Raphael Blumenfeld
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Propagation of mechanical stress through the actin cytoskeleton toward focal adhesions: model and experiment.

Authors:  Raja Paul; Patrick Heil; Joachim P Spatz; Ulrich S Schwarz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro.

Authors:  Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  A multiscale approach to modeling the passive mechanical contribution of cells in tissues.

Authors:  Victor K Lai; Mohammad F Hadi; Robert T Tranquillo; Victor H Barocas
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Altered mechanical properties of actin fibers due to breast cancer invasion: parameter identification based on micropipette aspiration and multiscale tensegrity modeling.

Authors:  Mohammad Tabatabaei; Mohammad Tafazzoli-Shadpour; Mohammad Mehdi Khani
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  A multi-modular tensegrity model of an actin stress fiber.

Authors:  Yaozhi Luo; Xian Xu; Tanmay Lele; Sanjay Kumar; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Tensegrity, cellular biophysics, and the mechanics of living systems.

Authors:  Donald E Ingber; Ning Wang; Dimitrije Stamenovic
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.