Literature DB >> 10790550

Microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Less invasive gallbladder surgery.

S W Unger1, J C Paramo, M Perez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We set out to compare a prospective evaluation of microlaparoscopic cholesystectomy (MLC) using 5-mm ports for the scope and operating ports and two 2-mm ports for retracting to the historic results of standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC).
METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients were operated electively for symptomatic gallstones between June 1997 and July 1998. Demographics, history of prior abdominal surgery, operative time, resident level, need to convert, length of stay, and postoperative analgesia were recorded for each case. In all, 43 women and 13 men aged 21 to 89 (average, 51 years) underwent MLC. Average weight was 78 kg (range, 48-119) and average height was 163 cm.
RESULTS: Operative time for MLC was 72+/-25 min (range, 35-140), somewhat less than the referenced standard of 79+/-27 min (p = 0.1). The skin-to-trocar time (6+/-2 vs. 13+/-77 min) and intraoperative cholangiogram time (9+/-8 vs. 11+/-6 min) were significantly shorter (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively) for MLC. Other partial times were not significantly different. PGY2 residents averaged 74+/-21 min (range, 44-118) compared to 75+/-27 min (range, 35-140) for PGY3 and 53+/-5 (range, 43-59) for PGY5. Patient weight influenced time. Patients <65 kg averaged 56 +/-12 min; 66-80 kg, 72+/-24 min; 81-95 kg, 78+/-26 min; and >95 kg, 85+/-22 min. Previous abdominal surgery did not affect operative time. Nine patients (16%) required conversion from 2- to 5-mm ports because of adhesions, wall thickening, or need for better retraction. Time in these patients was 95+/-26 min vs. 68+/-21 min in other patients (p<0.01). No patient was converted to an open procedure. Three patients (5%) had a positive cholangiogram and common bile duct exploration that required placement of an extra 5-mm trocar. Five patients (9%) required insertion of an additional 2-mm port. All patients received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Morphine use was 0.21+/-0.19 mg/kg (range, 0-0.8). Hospital stay was 1.31 days (range, 0.5-4). Subjective satisfaction was excellent because of smaller incisions. No additional morbidity was seen with MLC.
CONCLUSION: MLC is a feasible and safe approach that provides similar times to SLC with better cosmesis, a less painful recovery, and possibly an earlier return to normal activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10790550     DOI: 10.1007/s004640020059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  Needlescopic fundoplication.

Authors:  D E Pace; P M Chiasson; C M Schlachta; E C Poulin; Y Boutros; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Micro-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an alternative to single-port surgery.

Authors:  Denise McCormack; Pierre Saldinger; Andrei Cocieru; Suzanne House; Keith Zuccala
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery.

Authors:  Nobumi Tagaya; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Micropuncture cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  W G Ainslie; J A Catton; D Davides; S Dexter; J Gibson; M Larvin; M J McMahon; M Moore; S Smith; A Vezakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A SAGES technology and value assessment and pediatric committee evaluation of mini-laparoscopic instrumentation.

Authors:  Thom E Lobe; Lucian Panait; Giovanni Dapri; Peter M Denk; David Pechman; Luca Milone; Stefan Scholz; Bethany J Slater
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 6.  Is smaller necessarily better? A systematic review comparing the effects of minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Rory McCloy; Delia Randall; Stephan A Schug; Henrik Kehlet; Christian Simanski; Francis Bonnet; Frederic Camu; Barrie Fischer; Girish Joshi; Narinder Rawal; Edmund A M Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Retraction and triangulation with neodymium magnetic forceps for single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Guillermo Dominguez; Luis Durand; Julián De Rosa; Eduardo Danguise; Carlos Arozamena; Pedro A Ferraina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic-assisted peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: a microinvasive technique.

Authors:  Sergio A Carrillo; Marcelo M Ghersi; Stephen Wise Unger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Mini-laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the MiniLap® percutaneous surgical system: a series of 32 patients.

Authors:  Konstantinos Sapalidis; Christoforos Kosmidis; Nikos Michalopoulos; Stylianni Laskou; Efstathios Pavlidis; Stelios Mantalovas; Dimitrios Giannakidis; Aikaterini Amaniti; Charilaos Koulouris; Athanasios Katsaounis; Alexandru C Munteanu; Valeriou Surlin; Paul Zarogoulidis; Isaak Kesisoglou
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2018-09-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.