Literature DB >> 10789126

[Individual planning of liver surgery interventions with a virtual model of the liver and its associated structures].

D Högemann1, G Stamm, H Shin, K J Oldhafer, H J Schlitt, D Selle, H O Peitgen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In an interdisciplinary approach, HepaVision (MEVIS, Bremen), a software tool specifically developed for 3D visualization of the liver, was employed for individual planning of extensive liver resections and evaluation of living-relative donations. So far there is experience with more than 50 biphasic spiral CT examinations.
RESULTS: The spatial relationship of large tumors to crucial hepatic structures, the demonstration and evaluation of anatomic variants regarding vascular supply and the risk stratification of liver failure by volumetric analysis on the basis of portal venous drainage supported precise indication for surgery. Surgical safety is increased by preoperative planning and simulation of necessary vessel reconstructions. By hiding selective areas of portal venous drainage or applying freely selectable clip planes, segmental as well as non-anatomical resections can be simulated and their effects analyzed. The virtual preoperative situs was confirmed intraoperatively in all 17 patients of our study population who underwent segmental liver resection for either a tumor or living-relative donation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10789126     DOI: 10.1007/s001170050668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Computer-assisted operational planning for pediatric abdominal surgery. 3D-visualized MRI with volume rendering].

Authors:  P Günther; J Tröger; S Holland-Cunz; K L Waag; J P Schenk
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Surgical treatment of liver metastases].

Authors:  M Loss; E M Jung; M N Scherer; S A Farkas; H J Schlitt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Application and evaluation of interactive 3D PDF for presenting and sharing planning results for liver surgery in clinical routine.

Authors:  Axel Newe; Linda Becker; Andrea Schenk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Consensus recommendations of three-dimensional visualization for diagnosis and management of liver diseases.

Authors:  Chihua Fang; Jihyun An; Antonio Bruno; Xiujun Cai; Jia Fan; Jiro Fujimoto; Rita Golfieri; Xishan Hao; Hongchi Jiang; Long R Jiao; Anand V Kulkarni; Hauke Lang; Cosmas Rinaldi A Lesmana; Qiang Li; Lianxin Liu; Yingbin Liu; Wanyee Lau; Qiping Lu; Kwan Man; Hitoshi Maruyama; Cristina Mosconi; Necati Örmeci; Michael Pavlides; Guilherme Rezende; Joo Hyun Sohn; Sombat Treeprasertsuk; Valérie Vilgrain; Hao Wen; Sai Wen; Xianyao Quan; Rafael Ximenes; Yinmo Yang; Bixiang Zhang; Weiqi Zhang; Peng Zhang; Shaoxiang Zhang; Xiaolong Qi
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 6.047

5.  Local, semi-automatic, three-dimensional liver reconstruction or external provider? An analysis of performance and time expense.

Authors:  Markus Paschold; Florentine Huettl; Werner Kneist; Christian Boedecker; Alicia Poplawski; Tobias Huber; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.445

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.