PURPOSE: To report findings from Treatwell 5-a-Day process tracking. DESIGN: Worksites were randomly assigned to a minimal intervention control, worksite-only condition, or worksite-plus-family condition. SETTING:Twenty-two small community health centers in Massachusetts. SUBJECTS:Employees of the community health centers. INTERVENTION: Both intervention conditions included the formation of employee advisory boards; activities such as nutrition discussions and taste tests targeting individual behavior change; and point-of-purchase labeling as an environmental strategy. Worksite-plus-family sites incorporated activities such as family contests, campaigns, and picnics. MEASURES: Documentation of the number and type of activities for extent of implementation; number of participants in activities for reach; program awareness and participation from the follow-up employee survey (n = 1306, representing 76% [range, 56%-100%] of the sample); change in fruit and vegetable consumption from a comparison between the follow-up and baseline surveys (n = 1359, representing 87% [range, 75%-100%] of the sample). RESULTS: A higher number of activities per employee was significantly correlated with greater program awareness (.68; p = .006) and greater change in fruit and vegetable consumption (.55; p = .04). Greater participation in activities was significantly correlated with greater awareness (.67; p = .007), higher participation (.61; p = .02), and increase in fruit and vegetable consumption. (.55; p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide quantitative indicators of a dose-response relationship between the number of intervention activities per employee and higher percentage of employee participation and observed increases in fruit and vegetable consumption.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To report findings from Treatwell 5-a-Day process tracking. DESIGN: Worksites were randomly assigned to a minimal intervention control, worksite-only condition, or worksite-plus-family condition. SETTING: Twenty-two small community health centers in Massachusetts. SUBJECTS: Employees of the community health centers. INTERVENTION: Both intervention conditions included the formation of employee advisory boards; activities such as nutrition discussions and taste tests targeting individual behavior change; and point-of-purchase labeling as an environmental strategy. Worksite-plus-family sites incorporated activities such as family contests, campaigns, and picnics. MEASURES: Documentation of the number and type of activities for extent of implementation; number of participants in activities for reach; program awareness and participation from the follow-up employee survey (n = 1306, representing 76% [range, 56%-100%] of the sample); change in fruit and vegetable consumption from a comparison between the follow-up and baseline surveys (n = 1359, representing 87% [range, 75%-100%] of the sample). RESULTS: A higher number of activities per employee was significantly correlated with greater program awareness (.68; p = .006) and greater change in fruit and vegetable consumption (.55; p = .04). Greater participation in activities was significantly correlated with greater awareness (.67; p = .007), higher participation (.61; p = .02), and increase in fruit and vegetable consumption. (.55; p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide quantitative indicators of a dose-response relationship between the number of intervention activities per employee and higher percentage of employee participation and observed increases in fruit and vegetable consumption.
Authors: Luke Wolfenden; Sharni Goldman; Fiona G Stacey; Alice Grady; Melanie Kingsland; Christopher M Williams; John Wiggers; Andrew Milat; Chris Rissel; Adrian Bauman; Margaret M Farrell; France Légaré; Ali Ben Charif; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Rebecca K Hodder; Jannah Jones; Debbie Booth; Benjamin Parmenter; Tim Regan; Sze Lin Yoong Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-11-14
Authors: Donna B Johnson; Sharon Beaudoin; Lynne T Smith; Shirley A A Beresford; James P LoGerfo Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Evangelia Demou; Alice MacLean; Lismy J Cheripelli; Kate Hunt; Cindy M Gray Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2018-09-09 Impact factor: 5.024