Literature DB >> 10787021

Which is the best deprivation predictor of foetal and infant mortality rates?

R Joyce1, R Webb, J L Peacock, H Stirland.   

Abstract

This study investigates which, if any, population-based indicator of deprivation best predicts foetal and infant mortality rates in England. For the year 1995, the deprivation levels of 364 English Local Authorities were compared; using the three commonly used indicators, Jarman score, Townsend score and percentage unemployed. The predictive value of these for stillbirth, neonatal and infant mortality rates was then calculated. The three deprivation indicators were highly inter-correlated (r=0.866-0.924). For each mortality rate, the correlation with deprivation did not differ significantly for the three indicators of deprivation. We conclude, when comparing these outcomes in different areas of England, that any of the three deprivation indicators may be used to adjust for deprivation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10787021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  3 in total

1.  Prevalence of breastfeeding at four months in general practices in south London.

Authors:  J Sikorski; F Boyd; C Dezateux; A Wade; J Rowe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Non-random geographical distribution of infant mortality in Austria 1984-2002.

Authors:  Thomas Waldhoer; Gerald Haidinger; Martin Wald; Harald Heinzl
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Assessing the determinants of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths using routinely collected data in an inner city area.

Authors:  Nigel C Smeeton; Roberto J Rona; Pamela Dobson; Ruth Cochrane; Charles Wolfe
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 8.775

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.