Literature DB >> 10786294

Solving large scale phylogenetic problems using DCM2.

D H Huson1, L Vawter, T J Warnow.   

Abstract

In an earlier paper, we described a new method for phylogenetic tree reconstruction called the Disk Covering Method, or DCM. This is a general method which can be used with any existing phylogenetic method in order to improve its performance. We showed analytically and experimentally that when DCM is used in conjunction with polynomial time distance-based methods, it improves the accuracy of the trees reconstructed. In this paper, we discuss a variant on DCM, that we call DCM2. DCM2 is designed to be used with phylogenetic methods whose objective is the solution of NP-hard optimization problems. We show that DCM2 can be used to accelerate searches for Maximum Parsimony trees. We also motivate the need for solutions to NP-hard optimization problems by showing that on some very large and important datasets, the most popular (and presumably best performing) polynomial time distance methods have poor accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10786294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol        ISSN: 1553-0833


  6 in total

1.  Rec-DCM-Eigen: reconstructing a less parsimonious but more accurate tree in shorter time.

Authors:  Seunghwa Kang; Jijun Tang; Stephen W Schaeffer; David A Bader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  DACTAL: divide-and-conquer trees (almost) without alignments.

Authors:  Serita Nelesen; Kevin Liu; Li-San Wang; C Randal Linder; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Disk covering methods improve phylogenomic analyses.

Authors:  Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid; Tyler Hunt; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Bad Clade Deletion Supertrees: A Fast and Accurate Supertree Algorithm.

Authors:  Markus Fleischauer; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Using tree diversity to compare phylogenetic heuristics.

Authors:  Seung-Jin Sul; Suzanne Matthews; Tiffani L Williams
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Collecting reliable clades using the Greedy Strict Consensus Merger.

Authors:  Markus Fleischauer; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.