Literature DB >> 10785326

Survival and inactivation of classical swine fever virus.

S Edwards1.   

Abstract

Classical swine fever virus, like many enveloped viruses, may be regarded as moderately fragile. It shows a short but variable survival time in the environment, depending on physical conditions, but may remain viable for prolonged periods in favourable circumstances as found, for example, in stored meat. Published information is reviewed on the survival time of the virus under a variety of physical and chemical conditions, including the variable influence of environmental factors. The principles of virus inactivation by heat, pH or chemicals are discussed, with a consideration of the principles of containment for laboratories working with the virus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10785326     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(00)00143-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  16 in total

Review 1.  Is There a Risk for Introducing Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus (PRRSV) Through the Legal Importation of Pork?

Authors:  Megan C Niederwerder; Raymond R R Rowland
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  Classical swine fever in India: current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar Singh; Kaushal Kishore Rajak; Amit Kumar; Sharad Kumar Yadav
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Multiple linear B-cell epitopes of classical swine fever virus glycoprotein E2 expressed in E.coli as multiple epitope vaccine induces a protective immune response.

Authors:  Bin Zhou; Ke Liu; Yan Jiang; Jian-Chao Wei; Pu-Yan Chen
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 4.099

4.  In planta production of two peptides of the Classical Swine Fever Virus (CSFV) E2 glycoprotein fused to the coat protein of potato virus X.

Authors:  Gianpiero Marconi; Emidio Albertini; Pierluigi Barone; Francesca De Marchis; Chiara Lico; Carla Marusic; Domenico Rutili; Fabio Veronesi; Andrea Porceddu
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 2.563

5.  Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options.

Authors:  Ramy Salemdeeb; Erasmus K H J Zu Ermgassen; Mi Hyung Kim; Andrew Balmford; Abir Al-Tabbaa
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 9.297

6.  Comparison of Thermal and Non-Thermal Processing of Swine Feed and the Use of Selected Feed Additives on Inactivation of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV).

Authors:  Michaela P Trudeau; Harsha Verma; Fernando Sampedro; Pedro E Urriola; Gerald C Shurson; Jessica McKelvey; Suresh D Pillai; Sagar M Goyal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reducing the land use of EU pork production: where there's swill, there's a way.

Authors:  Erasmus K H J Zu Ermgassen; Ben Phalan; Rhys E Green; Andrew Balmford
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 8.  The control of classical swine fever in wild boar.

Authors:  Volker Moennig
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Hunters' acceptability of the surveillance system and alternative surveillance strategies for classical swine fever in wild boar - a participatory approach.

Authors:  Katja Schulz; Clémentine Calba; Marisa Peyre; Christoph Staubach; Franz J Conraths
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Relevance of Indirect Transmission for Wildlife Disease Surveillance.

Authors:  Martin Lange; Stephanie Kramer-Schadt; Hans-Hermann Thulke
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.