Literature DB >> 10784629

Loss of heterozygosity at 1p36 independently predicts for disease progression but not decreased overall survival probability in neuroblastoma patients: a Children's Cancer Group study.

J M Maris1, M J Weiss, C Guo, R B Gerbing, D O Stram, P S White, M D Hogarty, E P Sulman, P M Thompson, J N Lukens, K K Matthay, R C Seeger, G M Brodeur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the independent prognostic significance of 1p36 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in a representative group of neuroblastoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Diagnostic tumor specimens from 238 patients registered onto the most recent Children's Cancer Group phase III clinical trials were assayed for LOH with 13 microsatellite polymorphic markers spanning chromosome band 1p36. Allelic status at 1p36 was correlated with other prognostic variables and disease outcome.
RESULTS: LOH at 1p36 was detected in 83 (35%) of 238 neuroblastomas. There was a correlation of 1p36 LOH with age at diagnosis greater than 1 year (P = .026), metastatic disease (P<.001), elevated serum ferritin level (P<.001), unfavorable histopathology (P<.001), and MYCN oncogene amplification (P<.001). LOH at 1p36 was associated with decreased event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) probabilities (P<.0001). For the 180 cases with single-copy MYCN, 1p36 LOH status was highly correlated with decreased EFS (P = .0002) but not OS (P = .1212). Entering 1p36 LOH into a multivariate regression model suggested a trend toward an independent association with decreased EFS (P = .0558) but not with decreased OS (P = .3687). Furthermore, allelic status at 1p36 was the only prognostic variable that was significantly associated with decreased EFS in low-risk neuroblastoma patients (P = .0148).
CONCLUSION: LOH at 1p36 is independently associated with decreased EFS, but not OS, in neuroblastoma patients. Determination of 1p36 allelic status may be useful for predicting which neuroblastoma patients with otherwise favorable clinical and biologic features are more likely to have disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10784629     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.9.1888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  39 in total

1.  Presence of 1q gain and absence of 7p gain are new predictors of local or metastatic relapse in localized resectable neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Annalisa Pezzolo; Elena Rossi; Stefania Gimelli; Federica Parodi; Francesca Negri; Massimo Conte; Angela Pistorio; Angela Sementa; Vito Pistoia; Orsetta Zuffardi; Claudio Gambini
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Knowing your ABCCs: novel functions of ABCC transporters.

Authors:  Garrett M Brodeur
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Expression of SMARCF1, a truncated form of SWI1, in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  T Takeuchi; S Nicole; A Misaki; M Furihata; J Iwata; H Sonobe; Y Ohtsuki
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  Retinoic acid postconsolidation therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma patients treated with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Frank Peinemann; Elvira C van Dalen; Heike Enk; Frank Berthold
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-25

5.  Nervous system: Embryonal tumors: Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Caileigh Pudela; Skye Balyasny; Mark A Applebaum
Journal:  Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol       Date:  2020-07

6.  Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in a transgenic model of neuroblastoma proceeds through p53 induction.

Authors:  Louis Chesler; David D Goldenberg; Rodney Collins; Matt Grimmer; Grace E Kim; Tarik Tihan; Kim Nguyen; Slava Yakovenko; Katherine K Matthay; William A Weiss
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Region-specific detection of neuroblastoma loss of heterozygosity at multiple loci simultaneously using a SNP-based tag-array platform.

Authors:  John M Maris; George Hii; Craig A Gelfand; Shobha Varde; Peter S White; Eric Rappaport; Saul Surrey; Paolo Fortina
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Management and outcome of stage 3 neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Shakeel Modak; Brian H Kushner; Michael P LaQuaglia; Kim Kramer; Nai-Kong V Cheung
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the future.

Authors:  R D Riley; K R Abrams; A J Sutton; P C Lambert; D R Jones; D Heney; S A Burchill
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-04-22       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report.

Authors:  Susan L Cohn; Andrew D J Pearson; Wendy B London; Tom Monclair; Peter F Ambros; Garrett M Brodeur; Andreas Faldum; Barbara Hero; Tomoko Iehara; David Machin; Veronique Mosseri; Thorsten Simon; Alberto Garaventa; Victoria Castel; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.