Literature DB >> 10784610

TCR v(beta) usage and clonality of T cells isolated from progressing and rejected tumor sites before and after in vitro culture.

R A Kurt1, J A Park, S F Schluter, J J Marchalonis, E T Akporiaye.   

Abstract

A gelatin sponge model of concomitant tumor immunity was employed in order to examine the clonality of T cells associated with progressing and rejected tumor sites. Here we show that freshly isolated T cells bearing TCR V(beta)1, CDR3 RPGTGN, J(beta)1.1 and TCR V(beta)8, CDR3 GD, J(beta)1.6 predominated progressing and rejected tumor sites. Despite the similarity in T cell populations, the T cells from rejected tumor sites were capable of killing the autologous tumor cells, whereas T cells from progressing tumor sites were not able to do so. The differing cytolytic ability could not be attributed to a difference in TCR zeta chain protein expression levels between both T cell populations. After a 5 day mixed lymphocyte tumor culture the T cells from the progressing tumor site were capable of killing autologous tumor cells, which suggested changes took place within the cell population during in vitro culture. Further TCR analysis revealed T cells bearing TCR V(beta)1, CDR3 RPGTGN, J(beta)1.1 and TCR V(beta)8, CDR3 GD, J(beta)1.6 were not expanded following the in vitro culture. These data suggest that the lack of cytotoxicity of freshly isolated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) was not due to abnormal TCR zeta chain expression or major differences in the TCR V(beta) usage. Additionally, the gain of TIL effector function did not correlate with an expansion of the TCR bearing T cells found to predominate the in vivo response. These data suggest that the predominant TCR V(beta) used by lymphocytes infiltrating regressing or rejected tumors may not represent the tumor reactive T cells that grow in culture or respond to the autologous tumor in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10784610     DOI: 10.1093/intimm/12.5.639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Immunol        ISSN: 0953-8178            Impact factor:   4.823


  5 in total

Review 1.  Immune surveillance of tumors.

Authors:  Jeremy B Swann; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 2.  Suppression, subversion and escape: the role of regulatory T cells in cancer progression.

Authors:  K Oleinika; R J Nibbs; G J Graham; A R Fraser
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Shifting the equilibrium in cancer immunoediting: from tumor tolerance to eradication.

Authors:  Sergio A Quezada; Karl S Peggs; Tyler R Simpson; James P Allison
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.988

4.  Exchange of cytosolic content between T cells and tumor cells activates CD4 T cells and impedes cancer growth.

Authors:  Matthias Hardtke-Wolenski; Lilli Kraus; Christel Schmetz; Britta Trautewig; Fatih Noyan; Florian W R Vondran; Hueseyin Bektas; Juergen Klempnauer; Elmar Jaeckel; Thorsten Lieke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Metastatic Tumor Dormancy.

Authors:  Mary Osisami; Evan T Keller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.