| Literature DB >> 10784610 |
R A Kurt1, J A Park, S F Schluter, J J Marchalonis, E T Akporiaye.
Abstract
A gelatin sponge model of concomitant tumor immunity was employed in order to examine the clonality of T cells associated with progressing and rejected tumor sites. Here we show that freshly isolated T cells bearing TCR V(beta)1, CDR3 RPGTGN, J(beta)1.1 and TCR V(beta)8, CDR3 GD, J(beta)1.6 predominated progressing and rejected tumor sites. Despite the similarity in T cell populations, the T cells from rejected tumor sites were capable of killing the autologous tumor cells, whereas T cells from progressing tumor sites were not able to do so. The differing cytolytic ability could not be attributed to a difference in TCR zeta chain protein expression levels between both T cell populations. After a 5 day mixed lymphocyte tumor culture the T cells from the progressing tumor site were capable of killing autologous tumor cells, which suggested changes took place within the cell population during in vitro culture. Further TCR analysis revealed T cells bearing TCR V(beta)1, CDR3 RPGTGN, J(beta)1.1 and TCR V(beta)8, CDR3 GD, J(beta)1.6 were not expanded following the in vitro culture. These data suggest that the lack of cytotoxicity of freshly isolated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) was not due to abnormal TCR zeta chain expression or major differences in the TCR V(beta) usage. Additionally, the gain of TIL effector function did not correlate with an expansion of the TCR bearing T cells found to predominate the in vivo response. These data suggest that the predominant TCR V(beta) used by lymphocytes infiltrating regressing or rejected tumors may not represent the tumor reactive T cells that grow in culture or respond to the autologous tumor in vitro.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10784610 DOI: 10.1093/intimm/12.5.639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Immunol ISSN: 0953-8178 Impact factor: 4.823