Literature DB >> 10784140

Role of the carbohydrate moieties in chiral recognition on teicoplanin-based LC stationary phases.

A Berthod1, X Chen, J P Kullman, D W Armstrong, F Gasparrini, I D'Acquarica, C Villani, A Carotti.   

Abstract

For this study, we used the macrocyclic antibiotic teicoplanin, a molecule consisting of an aglycone peptide "basket" with three attached carbohydrate (sugar) moieties. The sugar units were removed and the aglycone was purified. Two chiral stationary phases (CSPs) were prepared in a similar way, one with the native teicoplanin molecule and the other with the aglycone. Twenty-six compounds were evaluated on the two CSPs with seven RPLC mobile phases and two polar organic mobile phases. The compounds were 13 amino acids or structurally related compounds (including DOPA, folinic acid, etc.) and 13 other compounds (such as carnitine, bromacil, etc.). The chromatographic results are given as the retention, selectivity, and resolution factors along with the peak efficiency and the enantioselective free energy difference corresponding to the separation of the two enantiomers. The polarities of the two CSPs are similar. It is clearly established that the aglycone is responsible for the enantioseparation of amino acids. The difference in enantioselective free energy between the aglycone CSP and the teicoplanin CSP was between 0.3 and 1 kcal/mol for amino acid enantioseparations. This produced resolution factors 2-5 times higher with the aglycone CSP. Four non amino acid compounds were separated only on the teicoplanin CSP. Six and five compounds were better separated on the teicoplanin and aglycone CSPs, respectively. Although the sugar units decrease the resolution of alpha-amino acid enantiomers, they can contribute significantly to the resolution of a number of non amino acid enantiomeric pairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10784140     DOI: 10.1021/ac991004t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  7 in total

Review 1.  Chiral separation principles in chromatographic and electromigration techniques.

Authors:  Gerald Gübitz; Martin G Schmid
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Considerations on HILIC and polar organic solvent-based separations: use of cyclodextrin and macrocyclic glycopetide stationary phases.

Authors:  Chunlei Wang; Chunxia Jiang; Daniel W Armstrong
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.645

3.  Comparison of performance of Chirobiotic T, T2 and TAG columns in the separation of beta2- and beta3-homoamino acids.

Authors:  Zoltán Pataj; István Ilisz; Robert Berkecz; Aleksandra Misicka; Dagmara Tymecka; Ferenc Fülöp; Daniel W Armstrong; Antal Péter
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.645

4.  Evaluation of dalbavancin as chiral selector for HPLC and comparison with teicoplanin-based chiral stationary phases.

Authors:  Xiaotong Zhang; Ye Bao; Ke Huang; Kimber L Barnett-Rundlett; Daniel W Armstrong
Journal:  Chirality       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.437

5.  Enantiomeric Resolution and Docking Studies of Chiral Xanthonic Derivatives on Chirobiotic Columns.

Authors:  Ye' Zaw Phyo; Sara Cravo; Andreia Palmeira; Maria Elizabeth Tiritan; Anake Kijjoa; Madalena M M Pinto; Carla Fernandes
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Immobilised teicoplanin does not demonstrate antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S Britton; K Lee; L Azizova; G Shaw; W Nishio Ayre; J P Mansell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Enantioselective Liquid Chromatographic Separations Using Macrocyclic Glycopeptide-Based Chiral Selectors.

Authors:  Róbert Berkecz; Dániel Tanács; Antal Péter; István Ilisz
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.