Literature DB >> 10783546

Does computerizing paper-and-pencil job attitude scales make a difference? New IRT analyses offer insight.

M A Donovan1, F Drasgow, T M Probst.   

Abstract

The measurement equivalence of 2 scales of the Job Descriptive Index (JDI; P. C. Smith, L. M. Kendall, & C. L. Hulin, 1969), the Supervisor Satisfaction scale and the Coworker Satisfaction scale, was examined across computerized and paper-and-pencil administrations. In this study, employees in 2 organizations (N = 1,777) were administered paper-and-pencil versions of the scales, and employees in a third organization (N = 509) were administered a computerized version. A newly developed item response theory (IRT) technique for examining differential test functioning (N. S. Raju, W. J. van der Linden, & P. F. Fleer, 1995) was used to examine measurement equivalence across media. Results support the measurement equivalence of the JDI Supervisor and Coworker scales across administration media. The implications of these findings for both practitioners and organizational researchers are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10783546     DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  6 in total

1.  Improving behaviour in self-testing (IBIS): Study on frequency of use, consequences, information needs and use, and quality of currently available consumer information (protocol).

Authors:  Janaica E J Grispen; Martine H P Ickenroth; Nanne K de Vries; Geert-Jan Dinant; Gaby Ronda; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Statistical considerations in the psychometric validation of outcome measures.

Authors:  Alla Sikorskii; Philip C Noble
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Mode effects in the center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D) scale: personal digital assistant vs. paper and pencil administration.

Authors:  Richard J Swartz; Carl de Moor; Karon F Cook; Rachel T Fouladi; Karen Basen-Engquist; Cathy Eng; Cindy L Carmack Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 3.440

4.  To test or not to test: a cross-sectional survey of the psychosocial determinants of self-testing for cholesterol, glucose, and HIV.

Authors:  Janaica E J Grispen; Gaby Ronda; Geert-Jan Dinant; Nanne K de Vries; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Measuring Job Satisfaction in Portuguese Military Sergeants and Officers: Validation of the Job Descriptive Index and the Job in General Scale.

Authors:  Silvia Lopes; Maria José Chambel; Filipa Castanheira; Fernando Oliveira-Cruz
Journal:  Mil Psychol       Date:  2015-01

6.  Assessing the equivalence of Web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis: a case of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ).

Authors:  Berend Terluin; Evelien P M Brouwers; Miquelle A G Marchand; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.147

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.