Literature DB >> 10783419

Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. American College of Emergency Physicians.

.   

Abstract

This clinical policy focuses on critical issues in the evaluation and management of patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina. A MEDLINE search for articles published between January 1993 and December 1998 was performed using combinations of the key words chest pain, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, thrombolytics, primary angioplasty, 12-lead ECG, ST-segment monitoring, cardiac serum markers, and chest pain centers. Subcommittee members and expert peer reviewers also supplied articles with direct bearing on the policy. This policy focuses on 5 areas of current interest and/or controversy: (1) ECG eligibility criteria for fibrinolytic therapy, (2) role of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction, (3) use of serum markers to diagnose acute myocardial infarction, (4) serial 12-lead ECGs during the initial evaluation, and (5) chest pain evaluation units. Recommendations for patient management are provided for each of these 5 topics based on strength of evidence (Standards, Guidelines, Options). Standards represent patient management principles that reflect a high degree of clinical certainty; Guidelines represent patient management principles that reflect moderate clinical certainty; and Options represent other patient management strategies based on preliminary, inconclusive, or conflicting evidence, or based on panel consensus. This guideline is intended for physicians working in hospital-based emergency departments or chest pain evaluation units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10783419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  6 in total

1.  Diagnosing myocardial infarction. Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a chest pain unit are in progress.

Authors:  S Goodacre; F Morris; S Campbell; D Quinney; S Capewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-08

2.  Diagnostic time course, treatment, and in-hospital outcomes for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting with nondiagnostic initial electrocardiogram: a report from the American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline program.

Authors:  Robert F Riley; L Kristin Newby; Creighton W Don; Matthew T Roe; DaJuanicia N Holmes; Sanjay K Gandhi; Michael A Kutcher; David M Herrington
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Cardiac markers in the low-risk chest pain patient.

Authors:  Scott G Weiner; Shamai A Grossman
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block: should new onset right bundle branch block be added to future guidelines as an indication for reperfusion therapy?

Authors:  Petr Widimsky; Filip Rohác; Josef Stásek; Petr Kala; Richard Rokyta; Boyko Kuzmanov; Martin Jakl; Martin Poloczek; Jan Kanovsky; Ivo Bernat; Ota Hlinomaz; Jan Belohlávek; Ales Král; Vratislav Mrázek; Vladimir Grigorov; Slaveyko Djambazov; Robert Petr; Jiri Knot; Dana Bílková; Michaela Fischerová; Karel Vondrák; Marek Maly; Alena Lorencová
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Utility of the History and Physical Examination in the Detection of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Emergency Department Patients.

Authors:  Zachary Dw Dezman; Amal Mattu; Richard Body
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05-03

6.  What decides the suspicion of acute coronary syndrome in acute chest pain patients?

Authors:  Alexander Kamali; Martin Söderholm; Ulf Ekelund
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2014-04-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.