Literature DB >> 10783360

Circulating concentrations of the antiprogestins CDB-2914 and mifepristone in the female rhesus monkey following various routes of administration.

J M Larner1, J R Reel, R P Blye.   

Abstract

The overall aim of these studies was to investigate the oral and i.m. bioavailability of CDB-2914 in intact female rhesus monkeys, and to compare the serum concentrations of CDB-2914 with that of mifepristone following oral administration. In the first study, a 50 mg bolus of CDB-2914 per monkey was administered intravenously, orally or intramuscularly. The area under the serum concentration-time curve for 72 h (AUC(0-72)) following i.v. injection was 18 320 +/- 2718 ng/ml*h, and that for oral administration was 10 464 +/- 3248 ng/ml*h. Thus, the oral bioavailability of CDB-2914 equivalents was 56%. The AUC(0-168 h) following i.m. injection was 11 226 +/- 1130 ng/ml*h. Therefore, the i.m. bioavailability of CDB-2914 equivalents was 62%. In the second study, the serum concentrations of CDB-2914 and mifepristone equivalents were compared following an oral bolus dose in two different formulations. When administered at 5 mg/kg in aqueous suspending vehicle (ASV), the mean peak serum concentration (C(max)) of CDB-2914 equivalents (192 +/- 64 ng/ml) occurred at 5 +/- 1 h, whereas the C(max) of mifepristone equivalents (82 +/- 25 ng/ml) occurred at 3 +/- 1 h. Following administration in gelatin capsules (35 mg/monkey), the C(max) of CDB-2914 equivalents (129 +/- 24 ng/ml) occurred at 5 +/- 1 h, while the C(max) of mifepristone equivalents (31 +/- 8 ng/ml) occurred at 3 +/- 1 h. The serum concentration (AUC(0-120 h)) of CDB-2914 equivalents was 4.7- or 5. 3-fold greater than that of mifepristone equivalents when administered orally in ASV or gelatin capsules respectively. The serum protein binding characteristics of CDB-2914 were also studied. CDB-2914 bound to human alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein (AAG), but not with as high an affinity as mifepristone. In contrast, neither CDB-2914 nor mifepristone bound with high affinity to AAG, corticosteroid binding globulin or sex hormone binding globulin in monkey serum. Collectively, these results indicated that CDB-2914 was more efficiently absorbed than mifepristone following oral administration to female rhesus monkeys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10783360     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.5.1100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  6 in total

1.  Effects of synthetic androgens on liver function using the rabbit as a model.

Authors:  Sheri Ann Hild; Barbara J Attardi; Sailaja Koduri; Bruce A Till; Jerry R Reel
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2010-04-08

2.  Effects of a novel estrogen-free, progesterone receptor modulator contraceptive vaginal ring on inhibition of ovulation, bleeding patterns and endometrium in normal women.

Authors:  Vivian Brache; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Alistair Williams; Diana Blithe; Horacio Croxatto; Narender Kumar; Sushma Kumar; Yun-Yen Tsong; Irving Sivin; Anita Nath; Heather Sussman; Leila Cochon; Maria Jose Miranda; Verónica Reyes; Anibal Faundes; Daniel Mishell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Medical termination of pregnancy in cynomolgus macaques.

Authors:  Elizabeth Micks; Taylor Shekell; Jessica Stanley; Mary Zelinski; Lauren Martin; Serena Riefenberg; Tiffany Adevai; Jeffrey Jensen
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 0.667

Review 4.  Vaginal ring delivery of selective progesterone receptor modulators for contraception.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  A randomized study on pharmacodynamic effects of vaginal rings delivering the progesterone receptor modulator ulipristal acetate: research for a novel estrogen-free, method of contraception.

Authors:  YongMei Huang; Jeffrey T Jensen; Vivian Brache; Leila Cochon; Alistair Williams; Maria-José Miranda; Horacio Croxatto; Narender Kumar; Heather Sussman; Elena Hoskin; Marlena Plagianos; Kevin Roberts; Ruth Merkatz; Diana Blithe; Regine Sitruk-Ware
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 6.  Selective Progesterone Receptor Modulators-Mechanisms and Therapeutic Utility.

Authors:  Md Soriful Islam; Sadia Afrin; Sara Isabel Jones; James Segars
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 19.871

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.