OBJECTIVE: Development of a scale to assess patients' social functioning, the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP). METHOD: PSP has been developed through focus groups and reliability studies on the basis of the social functioning component of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). The last reliability study was carried out by 39 workers with different professional roles on a sample of 61 psychiatric patients admitted to the rehabilitation unit. Each patient was rated independently on the scale by the two workers who knew them best. RESULTS: The PSP is a 100-point single-item rating scale, subdivided into 10 equal intervals. The ratings are based mainly on the assessment of patient's functioning in four main areas: 1) socially useful activities; 2) personal and social relationships; 3) self-care; and 4) disturbing and aggressive behaviours. Operational criteria to rate the levels of disabilities have been defined for the above-mentioned areas. Excellent inter-rater reliability was also obtained in less educated workers. CONCLUSION: Compared to SOFAS, PSP has better face validity and psychometric properties. It was found to be an acceptable, quick and valid measure of patients' personal and social functioning.
OBJECTIVE: Development of a scale to assess patients' social functioning, the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP). METHOD:PSP has been developed through focus groups and reliability studies on the basis of the social functioning component of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). The last reliability study was carried out by 39 workers with different professional roles on a sample of 61 psychiatricpatients admitted to the rehabilitation unit. Each patient was rated independently on the scale by the two workers who knew them best. RESULTS: The PSP is a 100-point single-item rating scale, subdivided into 10 equal intervals. The ratings are based mainly on the assessment of patient's functioning in four main areas: 1) socially useful activities; 2) personal and social relationships; 3) self-care; and 4) disturbing and aggressive behaviours. Operational criteria to rate the levels of disabilities have been defined for the above-mentioned areas. Excellent inter-rater reliability was also obtained in less educated workers. CONCLUSION: Compared to SOFAS, PSP has better face validity and psychometric properties. It was found to be an acceptable, quick and valid measure of patients' personal and social functioning.
Authors: Noah S Philip; Jennifer Barredo; Emily Aiken; Victoria Larson; Richard N Jones; M Tracie Shea; Benjamin D Greenberg; Mascha van 't Wout-Frank Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Martha Sajatovic; Jennifer Levin; Luis F Ramirez; David Y Hahn; Curtis Tatsuoka; Christopher S Bialko; Kristin A Cassidy; Edna Fuentes-Casiano; Tiffany D Williams Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.384