Literature DB >> 10782180

Adjustable gastric banding: 5-year experience.

S B Doldi1, G Micheletto, E Lattuada, M A Zappa, D Bona, U Sonvico.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: From 1993 to 1999, 172 patients underwent adjustable silicone gastric banding (ASGB) or laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB). In 109 patients the adjustable band was placed via laparoscopy; in the other patients it was placed via laparotomy (prelaparoscopic era, conversions from other bariatric operations, conversions for laparoscopic failure). The conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy was 9.3%, occurring in the early part of our experience.
METHODS: Mean age was 37.9 years, weight 135 +/- 14.8 kg (82-218) and BMI 46.3 +/- 5.4 (35.1-69.5). All patients had multiple band adjustments, temporary antisecretive, electrolyte and vitamin therapy, and follow-up per routine.
RESULTS: Weight loss at 3 years was 30.2%; mean percent loss of excess weight was 62.5%. There was no mortality. The most important technical complications were: gastric pouch dilatation that required band replacement or removal (5.8 %); mild gastric pouch dilatation reversible with adequate dietary and pharmacological treatment (4.6%); intraoperative gastric perforation (2.3%); band migration (0.6%). The band was removed in 2.3%, with conversion to another bariatric procedure in 1.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Results have been satisfactory thus far.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10782180     DOI: 10.1381/096089200321668730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  9 in total

1.  Preliminary results of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding procedure by a new generation of silicone band: MIDBAND.

Authors:  P M Blanc; J M Lagoutte; M C Picot; E Denève; C de Seguin; J M Fabre; D Nocca
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Intra-gastric band erosion from an un-inflated Lap-Band: a case report.

Authors:  L D George Angus; Kaleem Rizvon; Dahua Zhou; Eric Seitelman; Supriya Cardoza
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Band and port-related morbidity after bariatric surgery: an underestimated problem.

Authors:  M V Launay-Savary; K Slim; C Brugère; E Buc; E Nini; D Forestier; J Chipponi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Gastric band erosion, infection and migration causing jejunal obstruction.

Authors:  Omer Salar; Naseem Waraich; Rajeev Singh; Altaf Awan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-17

5.  Treatment of band erosion: feasibility and safety of endoscopic band removal.

Authors:  Enrico Mozzi; Ezio Lattuada; Marco Antonio Zappa; Paola Granelli; Fausto De Ruberto; Anna Armocida; Giancarlo Roviaro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Connection tubing causing small bowel obstruction and colonic erosion as a rare complication after laparoscopic gastric banding: a case report.

Authors:  Liza Bk Tan; Jimmy By So; Asim Shabbir
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2012-01-11

7.  Endoscopic management of gastric band erosions: a 7-year series of 14 patients.

Authors:  Ümit Bilge Dogan; Mustafa Salih Akin; Serkan Yalaki; Atilla Akova; Cengiz Yilmaz
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Band erosion following gastric banding: how to treat it.

Authors:  Ezio Lattuada; Marco Antonio Zappa; Enrico Mozzi; Giuseppe Fichera; Paola Granelli; Fausto De Ruberto; Ilaria Antonini; Stefano Radaelli; Giancarlo Roviaro
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  A rare complication after laparoscopic gastric banding: connecting-tube penetration into the hilus of the kidney.

Authors:  R Sneijder; H A Cense; M Hunfeld; R S Breederveld
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 4.129

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.