Literature DB >> 10782179

Gastroscopic band removal after intragastric migration of adjustable gastric band: a new minimal invasive technique.

H Weiss1, H Nehoda, B Labeck, R Peer, F Aigner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is the most used procedure for bariatric surgery in Europe. Although a low complication rate is reported, band migration within the first 2 years after LAGB is still observed in nearly 5% of cases, requiring operative band removal. To avoid increased risk of complications due to laparotomy, we propose a minimally invasive technique for this purpose.
METHODS: We performed this operation in five patients who suffered from band migration after LAGB (1.9% in our series of 211 patients, one patient was operated elsewhere). The described method consists of gastroscopic band and tube removal, combined with removal of the port under local anesthesia.
RESULTS: The described procedure was developed in the endoscopy unit without additional equipment. The mean operating-time ranged from 65 to 180 minutes (mean 135 minutes). No perioperative complication were observed. In-patient treatment was necessary for 4 days.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel technique for minimally invasive band removal after adjustable gastric band migration is described, offering the patient a low-risk procedure and a better chance for further laparoscopic approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10782179     DOI: 10.1381/096089200321668721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  24 in total

Review 1.  Major complications of bariatric surgery: endoscopy as first-line treatment.

Authors:  Pierre Eisendrath; Jacques Deviere
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  [Band migration. A late complication of gastric banding].

Authors:  C Stroh; U Hohmann; F Arnold; T Manger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Migration of adjustable gastric banding from a cohort study of 4236 patients.

Authors:  D Nocca; V Frering; B Gallix; C de Seguin des Hons; P Noël; M A Pierredon Foulonge; B Millat; J M Fabre
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  [Complications after adjustable gastric banding. Results of an inquiry in Germany].

Authors:  C Stroh; T Manger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Intragastric band erosion: experiences with gastrointestinal endoscopic removal.

Authors:  Edo Oscar Aarts; Bas van Wageningen; Frits Berends; Ignace Janssen; Peter Wahab; Marcel Groenen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Gastric banding - to band or bypass. Adjustable gastric banding: blessing or curse?

Authors:  Jacques M Himpens
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Inadequate weight loss vs secondary weight regain: laparoscopic conversion from gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  F B Langer; A Bohdjalian; S Shakeri-Manesch; F X Felberbauer; B Ludvik; J Zacherl; G Prager
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Management of band erosion with omental plugging: case series from a 5-year laparoscopic gastric banding experience.

Authors:  P Thomas Cherian; G Goussous; A Sigurdsson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Revisional Gastric Bypass After Failed Adjustable Gastric Banding-One-Stage or Two-Stage Procedure?

Authors:  A Schäfer; Philipp Gehwolf; J Umlauft; T Dziodzio; M Biebl; A Perathoner; F Cakar-Beck; H Wykypiel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Outcome and complications after laparoscopic Swedish adjustable gastric banding: 5-year results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Markus Naef; Ursula Naef; Wolfgang G Mouton; Hans E Wagner
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.