Literature DB >> 10781760

Acute hemodynamic effects of right ventricular pacing site and pacing mode in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to either ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

M R Gold1, R Brockman, R W Peters, M R Olsovsky, S R Shorofsky.   

Abstract

The hemodynamic effects of pacing in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) remain controversial. Early studies reported that pacing from the right ventricular (RV) apex improved acute hemodynamic parameters in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, but these findings were not confirmed in subsequent controlled studies. More recently, it has been proposed that pacing from the RV side of the ventricular septum improves hemodynamic function compared with intrinsic conduction or apical pacing. Either dual-chamber or ventricular pacing have been evaluated, again with inconsistent findings. To assess the effects of pacing site and mode on acute hemodynamic function, we evaluated 21 subjects with CHF and intrinsic conduction disease. Hemodynamics were compared in AAI, VVI, and DDD modes with pacing from the RV apex or high septum. The pacing rate was constant in each patient and the order of testing was randomized. In the absence of ventricular pacing (AAI mode), the mean systemic arterial pressure was 85 +/- 11 mm Hg, the right atrial pressure was 11 +/- 4 mm Hg, the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 18 +/- 8 mm Hg and the cardiac index was 2.4 +/- 0.7 L/min/m(2). Compared with AAI pacing, there were no improvements in any hemodynamic parameter with DDD pacing from either RV site. Hemodynamic function worsened with VVI pacing from both RV sites. Subgroup analyses of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, with prolonged PR interval, or with significant mitral regurgitation also failed to demonstrate an improvement with pacing. We conclude that pacing mode but not RV pacing site affects acute hemodynamic function. Pacing in the DDD mode prevents the deleterious effects of VVI pacing in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10781760     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)00704-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  Permanent pacing: new indications.

Authors:  M R Gold
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Strategic choices to reduce implantable cardioverter-defibrillator-related morbidity.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Comparison of the acute hemodynamic effect of right ventricular apex, outflow tract, and dual-site right ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Andrzej Rubaj; Piotr Rucinski; Tomasz Sodolski; Andrzej Bilan; Marcin Gulaj; Alicja Dabrowska-Kugacka; Andrzej Kutarski
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  [Is resynchronization therapy necessary when optimizing right ventricular stimulation?].

Authors:  G Fröhlig
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2008-12

Review 5.  Right Ventricular Versus Biventricular Pacing for Heart Failure and Atrioventricular Block.

Authors:  Hiroko Beck; Anne B Curtis
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-10

6.  Development of mitral and tricuspid regurgitation in right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pacing.

Authors:  Sevil Hemayat; Akbar Shafiee; Saeed Oraii; Farideh Roshanali; Farshid Alaedini; Amirhossein Sami Aldoboni
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Integrative and quantitive evaluation of the efficacy of his bundle related pacing in comparison with conventional right ventricular pacing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ziqing Yu; Ruizhen Chen; Yangang Su; Xueying Chen; Shengmei Qin; Minghui Li; Fei Han; Junbo Ge
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 8.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.

Authors:  J Dretzke; W D Toff; G Y H Lip; J Raftery; A Fry-Smith; R Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.